S.Nirmala v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
Three writ petitions filed seeking mandamus directing the Joint Commissioner of HR&CE to dispose of a petitioners' representation regarding document registration. The court directed the respondents to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within one month without adjudicating on merits.
What did the court decide?
Direction to consider the representation dated 05.03.2022 and pass orders on merits within one month.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.Nos.886, 890 & 892 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.01.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
WP.Nos.886, 890 & 892 of 2023
S.Nirmala ...Petitioner in W.P.No.886/2023
G.Vishwanathan ...Petitioner in W.P.No.890/2023
L.Selvaraj ...Petitioner in W.P.No.892/2023
Vs.
1.The Commissioner
Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department 119, Uthamar Gandhi Road Chennai 600 034.
- 2.The Joint Commissioner
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents should be directed to consider the petitioners' representation regarding the registration of documents in properties declared as temple properties.
Whether the direction to dispose of the representation within one month should be issued.
Whether the disputed properties are private or temple properties affecting document registration.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S.Nirmala
- petitioner
G.Vishwanathan
- petitioner
L.Selvaraj
- respondent
The Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department
- respondent
The Joint Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court