Writ petition seeking mandamus for police protection. Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation strictly on its merits and dispose the petition.
Directed the first respondent to consider the petitioner's representation and take a decision on its merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.8369 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 12.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH
W.P.No.8369 of 2022
P.Subramani M/s.Teru Murugan Blue Metal, Managing Partner, SF No.506, Kattumunnur, Aravakuruchi Taluk, Tamil Nadu – 639 111. .. Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the first respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner based on his representation dated 02.03.2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.Ma.Gouthaman for Mr.M.Rakhi For Respondents : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
W.P.No.8369 of 2022
ORDER
This Writ petition has been filed for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the first respondent to provide adequate police protection to the petitioner based on the representation dated 02.03.2022.
Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondents.
been raised in the writ petition. It will suffice, if a direction is given to the first respondent to consider the representation made by the petitioner and respond for the same.
representation made by the petitioner on 02.03.2022 and take a decision strictly on its own merits and in accordance with law.
W.P.No.8369 of 2022
costs.
12.07.2023
Index :Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order rsi
To
W.P.No.8369 of 2022
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.
rsi
W.P.No.8369 of 2022
12.07.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondents should consider the petitioner's representation regarding the request for police protection.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
P.Subramani
The Superintendent of Police, Erode
The Inspector of Police, Kodumudi
N. ANAND VENKATESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
