were granted the benefit of G.O.Ms.No.332 dated 16.07.2010 and have also been absorbed for the services. When this Court had specifically directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for an employment by taking note of G.O.Ms.No.332 before the end of March 2011, there was a duty cast on the respondents to comply with the order or in the alternative to challenge the same. Having failed to challenge the order passed by the learned single Judge, the only option available is to comply with this order. In this regard, learned counsel for the petitioner also produced a letter of Principal Secretary / Commissioner of Revenue Administration, dated 17.05.2012, in which, specific directions have been given to the Project Director of Tsunami Project Implementation Unit, that orders for absorption have also been passed to the temporary employees, who are ousted from Tsunami Project Implementation Unit in the Revenue Department and therefore, similar orders may be passed in the case of the petitioner herein. In the said letter, earlier orders of this Court passed in W.P.No.27360 of 2010, insofar as it has fixed a time limit for complying with the order, was also taken note of, the said letter dated 17.05.2012 is as follows:
