Dismissed

P.Senthil Murugan v. The Director

Madras HC20 Jun 2023WP/7864/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Madras dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 concerning the quashing of an impugned order regarding a government hospital tender proceeding. The petition was dismissed due to the petitioner's non-appearance and subsequent court inference of lack of interest in prosecuting the matter.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected petitions closed; no costs awarded.

P.Senthil Murugan Vs The Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP.No.7864 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated:20.06.2023

¶4

Coram:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU

¶6

W.P. No.7864 of 2020 and WMP.Nos. 9275 & 9276 of 2020

¶7

P. Senthil Murugan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Director, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services D.M.S. Complex, 3rd Floor Teynampet, Chennai-600 006.

¶10

The Joint Director of Health Services Namakkal District Namakkal-637 001.

¶11

The Medical Officer Government Hospital Paramathyvelur Namakkal.

¶12

V. Maheswari ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶14

Page No.1 / 4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

WP.No.7864 of 2020

¶17

for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned order vide no:4742/KI/2019-3 of the 2^nd respondent dated 26/11/2019 issued to the 4^th respondent, on the file of the above mentioned 2^nd respondent respectively and to quash the same and direct the 2^nd respondent to issue order accepting the price bid (cover B) of the eligible bidder (i.e) petitioner for the Re-Tender Notice dated 04.10.2019 and for supply of diet articles for the second half year from 27.11.2019 to 31.03.2020 for the Government Hospital, Paramathyvelur, Namakkal and to pass such other or further orders.

¶18

For Petitioner : No Appearance

¶19

For Respondents : Mr. Abishek Murthy Government Advocate for RR1 to 3

¶20

ORDER

¶21

The writ petition was listed on 19.06.2023 and there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, Registry was directed to post the writ petition on 20.06.2023, under the caption, "for dismissal". Even today, when the matter is called there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Writ Petition. Hence, the Writ Petition stands dismissed for

¶22

Page No.2 / 4

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

WP.No.7864 of 2020

¶25

non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶26

20.06.2023

¶27

Index:Yes/No Neutral citation:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Jer

¶28

To 1.The Director, Directorate of Medical and Rural Health Services D.M.S. Complex, 3rd Floor Teynampet, Chennai-600006 2. The Joint Director of Health Services Namakkal District Namakkal-637001

¶29

The Medical Officer Government Hospital Paramathyvelur Namakkal

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Page No.3 / 4

¶32

WP.No.7864 of 2020

¶33

J.NISHA BANU, J.,

¶34

Jer

¶35

W.P. No.7864 of 2020

¶36

and W.M.P. Nos. 9275 & 9276 of 2020

¶37

20.06.2023

¶38

Page No.4 / 4

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

P.Senthil Murugan v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Senthil Murugan v. The Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Velumani Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

S.Chandran, Vs the Presiding Officer

Alanguddi Village Panchayat Vs The Secretary to Govr.

K.Beemi Reddy Ponnusamy Vs The Inspector General of Registration

Mrs.Ambika Vs Union of India

Kizhakku Pagudhi Usman Saalai Vs The Inspcctor General of Registrations