Disposed

S.Chitra v. The Chairman

Madras HC20 Jul 2023WP/7679/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition wherein a petitioner sought appointment as a Sewing Teacher. While the petitioner had passed the exam, her name was excluded from the tentative list due to a missing equivalence certificate. The respondent admitted that submitting the certificate would render her eligible. The Court directed the respondent to include the petitioner in the selection process and

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to submit the equivalence certificate. Upon receipt, she must be included in the selection process, and results must be published within four weeks.

S.Chitra Vs The Chairman — Education and Admissions | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.07.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI

¶6

W.P.No.7679 of 2016

¶7

S.Chitra .. Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Chairman, Teacher Recruitment Board, 4^th Floor, E.v.K.Sampath Maligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006. .. Respondents

¶10

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of sewing Teacher under MBC/DNC WT DW category in appropriate department based on merit in the selection.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Sankaran, Senior Counsel for Mr.G.R.Ramesh Prabbhu For Respondent : Mr. R.Neelakandan, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.C.Kathiravan, Additional Government Pleader

¶12

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Writ Petition has been filed in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus seeking direction to the respondents to consider the petitioner for appointment to the post of Sewing Teacher under in MBC/DNC WT DW category in appropriate department based on merit in the selection.

¶17

Based on the notification issued by the respondents in notification No.05/2017 dated 26.07.2017 for direct recruitment of Special Teachers including Sewing Teachers for the vacancies of the year 20122016, the petitioner applied the same under MBC/DNC WT DW and attended the examination conducted on 27/09/2017. Subsequently, after publication of results, provisional list of candidates were published. The petitioner has secured 53 marks under the most backward class category. Her name was also included in the list of candidates published on 27.02.2018. Thereafterwards, the petitioner had appeared for certificate verification and her certificates had been duly verified. After completion of the process of certificate verification, the tentative provisional selection list has been published in the year 2018 wherein the petitioner name was not found. However, it is the contention of the petitioner that as per the

¶18

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

¶21

selection list one post of sewing teacher in MBC/DNC WT DW category was kept under reserved caption. Since, the name of the petitioner was not found in the selection list, she is before this Court seeking the prayer cited supra.

¶22

Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that as per the selection list, the post of Sewing Teacher in MBC/DNC WT DW was kept under reserved caption and the petitioner is the only eligible candidate participated in the certificate verification under that category. Hence, the petitioner may be given appointment under the said category.

¶23

It is submitted by the learned Additional Advocate General that

¶24

the board had published the revised selection list on 09.09.2019 for 201 candidates for the post of special teacher and all the candidates have joined their respective duties. On 12.10.2021, to fill up the unfilled vacancies, the board had revised earlier selection list dated 09.09.2019. Whereby 18 candidates were newly selected in addition to the above said 201 candidates. However, the additionally selected candidates have not been issued with the appointment order till date.

¶25

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

¶28

Learned Additional Advocate General submitted that the

¶29

petitioner had produced Embroidery and Needle Work Trade certificate having undergone training at Anjuman Private Industrial Technical Institute, Chennai and the certificate issued by National Council for Vocational Training. Since, no equivalence certificate was issued treating the above qualification offered by National Council for vocational training as equivalent qualification certificate as equivalent qualification to the Tamil Nadu Government, the petitioner is not eligible for the said post. He further submitted that after a lapse of three years, now the petitioner has produced G.O.(Ms).No.50, Labour Welfare and Skill Development (S2) Department dated 14.03.2003 stating that the course completed by the petitioner is equivalent to the courses conducted by the State Government.

¶30

This Court heard the learned counsel appearing on either side

¶31

and perused the materials available on record.

¶32

It is an admitted fact that one post has been reserved for the

¶33

petitioner vide order of this Court. It is also not in dispute that the

¶34

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

¶37

Government selected 18 additional posts to fill up the unfilled vacancies.

¶38

Further, the respondent had also admitted that the petitioner has now produced the G.O granting equivalent certificate. Further, the respondents also given the following clarification in response to the queries raised by this Court vide order dated 07.07.2023:-

¶39

i) The Vacant posts for sewing-Special Teachers for the year 2012-2016 have not been fully filled up pertaining to School Education Department.

¶40

ii) The Vacant posts announced in the Notification have not been fully filled up and the necessary actions are being taken to fill the said vacant posts.

¶41

iii)If the Petitioners submit Equivalence Certificate for their undergraduate study during certificate verification, the same will be considered as per rules.

¶42

In the light of the above, having admitted by the respondent

¶43

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

¶46

that if the petitioner has submitted the equivalent certificate, the same will be considered as per the rules, this Court is inclined to issue a direction to the respondent to complete the selection process among the eligible candidates along with the petitioner and publish the results within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶47

Accordingly, this Writ Petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid direction. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶48

20.07.2023

¶49

NHS Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order To

¶50

The Chairman, Teacher Recruitment Board, 4^th Floor, E.v.K.Sampath Maligai, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai-600 006.

¶51

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

NHS

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶58

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

W.P.No.7679 of 2019

20.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Chitra v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Chitra v. The Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A.Savarinathan Vs The Presiding Officer

The Superintendent of Post Vs The Presiding Officer

The Management, Vs The Presiding Officer

The Management of Sri Vs The Presiding Officer

S.Chithra Vs G.Latha

The Management of Vs The Presiding Officer