In a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. Agreeing with this submission, the single judge dismissed the writ petition as infructuous without costs.
The writ petition stood dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.7195 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.7195 of 2019
R.A.Adithan
...Petitioner
Vs.
2.The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Dharmapuri District.
3.R.A.Anbalagan
...Respondents
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the petitioner's representation dated 24.09.2018.
F or Petitioner : Mr.V.Sakkarapani For R1 & R2 : Mr.C.Jayaprakash Government Advocate For R3 : Mr.V.Vijayakumar
Page 1 of 3
W.P.No.7195 of 2019
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
cse
ORDER
The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, made a
submission that the writ petition has become infructuous and hence the same
may be dismissed. He has also made an endorsement to that effect.
07.09.2023
cse Index:Yes/No
To
W.P.No.7195 of 2019
Page 2 of 3
W.P.No.7195 of 2019
Page 3 of 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as infructuous after the petitioner's counsel endorsed the same.
R.A.Adithan
The District Collector, Dharmapuri
The District Revenue Officer, District Revenue Office, Dharmapuri District
R.A.Anbalagan
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
