Dafinny, v. The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
In this writ petition challenging an order denying a Most Backward Class community certificate, the respondents stated they had complied based on the petitioner's parents' religion. The court closed the petition as infructuous.
What did the court decide?
The Writ Petition is closed as infructuous and no costs are awarded.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.6803 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.07.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.6803 of 2020 and
W.MP.No.8107 of 2020
Dafinny
... Petitioner
Vs.
- The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ayanavaram, Chennai - 600 023.
- The District Collector, Singaravelar Maaligai, Beach Road, Chennai - 600 001.
... Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition survives for adjudication given that the prayer has been complied with.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dafinny
- respondent
The Zonal Deputy Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Ayanavaram, Chennai
- respondent
The District Collector, Singaravelar Maaligai, Beach Road, Chennai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court