Dismissed

Neyveli Lignite Corporation v. Joint Director

Madras HC17 Jul 2023WP/6395/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner corporation challenged a show cause notice issued regarding alleged irregularities during an inspection. The Court held that writ jurisdiction does not extend to interfering with such notices unless they are vague or the authority lacks jurisdiction. The petitioner was directed to submit an explanation.

What did the court decide?

None; the Writ Petition was dismissed. The respondent authority was directed to consider the explanation within twelve weeks.

Neyveli Lignite Corporation Vs Joint Director — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.6395 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 17.07.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.6395 of 2016

¶6

and W.M.P.Ns.5691 of 2016, 3225 & 25276 of 2017

¶7

Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Represented by its Chief General Manager, Neyveli New Thermal Power Project, Neyveli 607 807. . . . Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.Joint Director Industrial Safety and Health, Office of the Joint Director (Industrial Safety and Health) Government of Tamil Nadu,

¶10

Cuddalore.

¶11

The Government of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Labour, Fort St.George, Chennai-6.

¶12

R.Rajasekaran, Joint Director (Industrial Safety and Health) E-105, Rajaji Road, Block 19, Neyveli 607 803. . . . Respondents

¶13

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.6395 of 2016

¶16

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari any other Writ, Order or Direction in the nature of Writ of Certiorari, call for the records of the proceeding bearing No.Na.Ka.No.E/332/2016 dt.03/02.2016 on the file of the 1^st respondent quash the same.

¶17

For petitioner : M/s.F.B.Benjamin George For Respondents : Mr.V.Ravi,

¶18

Special Government Pleader for R1 & R2

¶19

ORDER

¶20

Aggrieved by the impugned show cause notice issued by the 1^st

¶21

respondent, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶22

It is the case of the petitioner that pursuant to the inspection

¶23

conducted in the petitioner corporation on 22.01.2016, alleging irregularities, a show cause notice has been issued by the 1^st respondent, calling upon the Chairman and the Managing Director of the petitioner corporation to show cause as to why they should not be prosecuted in view of the alleged irregularities. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner is before this Court.

¶24

This Court heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and

¶25

perused the materials available on record.

¶26

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.6395 of 2016

¶29

Though the present Writ Petition has been filed challenging the impugned order of issuance of show cause notice, however, it has been the consistent view of the Courts that the Courts cannot interfere with the show cause notice at the threshold except for lack of jurisdiction or vague. Therefore, the prayer sought for in the present Writ Petition cannot be entertained. The petitioner has to necessarily submit his explanation to the show cause notice. Upon receipt of such explanation, the 1^st respondent is directed to pass appropriate orders on the same within a period of twelve weeks from the date of explanation. However, it is open for the petitioner to raise objections, if any, before the said authority.

¶30

With the above observations, this Writ Petition stands dismissed.

¶31

There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous

¶32

Petitions are closed.

¶33

17.07.2023

¶34

Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No

¶35

NHS

¶36

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.6395 of 2016

M.DHANDAPANI, J

NHS

1.Joint Director Industrial Safety and Health, Office of the Joint Director (Industrial Safety and Health) Government of Tamil Nadu, Cuddalore.

¶43

2.The Government of Tamilnadu, Represented by its Secretary, Department of Labour, Fort St.George, Chennai-6.

¶44

R.Rajasekaran,

¶45

Joint Director (Industrial Safety and Health) E-105, Rajaji Road, Block 19, Neyveli 607 803.

W.P.No.6395 of 2016

17.07.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Neyveli Lignite Corporation v. Joint Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neyveli Lignite Corporation v. Joint Director

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Puhazhenthi Vs Thiru.N.Varadarajan

The Management Vs Nethaji Transport

Devi and 52 Others Vs K.Chackarai

Sathish Vs State Rep.by

The Management, H.H.619 Vs M.Vasudevan

The Management Vs The Presiding Officer