Beaula v. The Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing the Tahsildar to certify that her full legal name and present government-record name refer to the same person. The court directed the respondent to consider the representation and pass appropriate orders within four weeks.
What did the court decide?
Respondent directed to consider petitioner's representation and reminder and pass appropriate orders on merits within four weeks.
What the court decided
W.P.No.581 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 24.03.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.581 of 2023 and W.M.P.No.8878 of 2023
Beaula
... Petitioner
Vs.
The Tahsildar Mambalam Taluk, West Jafferkhanpet, Chennai – 600 083. ... Respondent
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent herein to consider the petitioner's representation dated 18.10.2022 followed up by the reminder dated 13.12.2022, and there by directing the respondent to issue a certificate by certifying the petitioner's full name (viz.,) A.Beaula Helina Rubavathay (as mentioned in the Sl.No.3 of the Legal Heirship Certificate in D.Dis (D1) 37556/03, dated 04.11.2003, and in Sl.No.2 of the Legal Heirship Certificate in R.Dis.D1/2258/2014, dated 02.04.2014) and the petitioner's present name (viz.,) Beaula (as mentioned in the government records) is one and the same person.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent should be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and reminder regarding the certification of her full name.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Beaula
- respondent
The Tahsildar Mambalam Taluk, West Jafferkhanpet, Chennai
Coram
M. DHANDAPANI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court