D.Arputha Rajendran v. The Member secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition filed under Article 226 seeking quashing of an order and reinstatement in service was dismissed as withdrawn by the petition counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.5708 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH
W.P.No.5708 of 2023 and WMP Nos.5706 and 5708 of 2023
D.Arputha Rajendran
...Petitioner
-Vs-
The Member Secretary, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, Director (Ex-officio) Youth Affairs, J.N.Stadium, Periyamedu, Chennai-600 003. ...Respondent
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in his proceedings No.10780/HR-1/2022 dated 30.01.2023 and quash the same and consequently directing the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service.
For Petitioner : Ms.R.Hemalatha For Respondent : MrK.Azhagu Raman
1/2
W.P.No.5708 of 2023
M.S.RAMESH,J.
sr
ORDER
The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the court bundle.
01.11.2023
Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No sr To The Member Secretary, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu, Director (Ex-officio) Youth Affairs, J.N.Stadium, Periyamedu, Chennai-600 003.
W.P.No.5708 of 2023
2/2
D.Arputha Rajendran
Member Secretary, Sports Development Authority of Tamil Nadu
M.S.RAMESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court