Disposed

L.Malathi v. The District Educational Officer

Madras HC13 Oct 2023WP/5379/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Common order disposing of multiple writ petitions seeking revision of pay scale and arrears. The Court directed the second respondent to consider late representations and pass an order on merits within six weeks, condoning delay.

What did the court decide?

Directed the second respondent to consider petitioners' representations dated 05.10.2023 and pass an order on merits within six weeks.

L.Malathi Vs The District Educational Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5392, 5402 & 5491 of 2020

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED:13.10.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA

¶6

W.P.Nos. 5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5390, 5392, 5393, 5394, 5396 , 5398, 5399, 5402 , & 5491 of 2020

¶7

W.P.No.5379 of 2020

¶8

L. Malathi ... Petitioner

¶9

versus

¶10

The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Officer, S.S. Kulam Educational District, Coimbatore District.

¶11

The Block Educational Officer, O/o. The Block Educational Officer, S.S.Kulam Educational District, Coimbatore District.

¶12

The Head Master, Panchayath Union Primary School, Kadampadi , Sulur Union, S.S.Kulam Educational District, Coimbatore District

¶13

... Respondents

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5392, 5402 & 5491 of 2020

¶17

Prayer

¶18

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,

¶19

praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2 nd respondent to revise the pay scale of the petitioner as per the G.O.Ms.No.234 dated 01.06.2009 issued by the Finance (Pay Cell) Department, read with G.O.Ms.No.240 dated 22.07.2013 issued by the Finance (Pay Cell) Department, based on the petitioner's representation dated 05.10.2013 submitted within time limit prescribed therein for having acquired selection grade in qualified time for invoking re option to revise the scale of pay, consequently direct the respondents 1 &2 to disburse the entire arrears of salary, all attendant monetary, service benefit., etc forthwith within the time frame as fixed by this court.

¶20

For Petitioner : M/s. S.Menaka, in all W.Ps. for Mr.A.C.Manibharathi For Respondents : Mr.T.Chezhiyan, in all W.Ps Additional Government Special Government Pleader

¶21

2/6

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.No.5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5392, 5402 & 5491 of 2020

¶24

CO M M O N O R D E R

¶25

Since the issues involved in all these writ petitions are one and the

¶26

same, they are taken up together and disposed of by way of a common order.

¶27

2. All the petitioners have been working as B.T. Assistant in the third respondent school. The Government has decided to implement the recommendations of Pay Grievance Redressal Cell as per the 7 th Pay Commission and granted permission to the employees as a final opportunity for exercising re-option to come over to the revised scale of pay between 01.01.2006 and 31.05.2009 as an one time measure in cases where option could not be exercised within the time limit to the advantage of the individual employees. However, such re-option should not be given any case lead to fixation of lower pay than what has already been fixed. The said Government Order in G.O.Ms.No.240, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 22.07.2013 has been issued, in which, it has also been stated that it shall be in force for a period of six months from the date of issue.

¶28

3/6

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5392, 5402 & 5491 of 2020

¶31

3. All the petitioners, who failed to exercise their option within the

¶32

time limit, have come out with the similar request to enjoy the benefits given vide 7 th Pay Commission.

¶33

4. It is true that the writ petitioners ought to have abided the time limit given in G.O.Ms.No.240, Finance (Pay Cell) Department, dated 22.07.2013. However, I feel that the representations of the petitioners can be sympathetically considered by condoning the delay taking into consideration of the fact that those benefits are being enjoyed by the similarly placed employees, who are in service.

¶34

5. Hence, the second respondent is directed to consider the representations of the petitioners dated 05.10.2023 and pass appropriate order on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order . No costs.

¶35

13.10.2023 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No Neutral Citation : Yes / No mrp

¶36

4/6

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5392, 5402 & 5491 of 2020

¶39

¶40

The District Educational Officer, O/o. The District Educational Officer, S.S. Kulam Educational District, Coimbatore District.

¶41

The Block Educational Officer, O/o. The Block Educational Officer, S.S.Kulam Educational District, Coimbatore District.

¶42

The Head Master, Panchayath Union Primaryl School, Kadampadi , Sulur Union, S.S.Kulam Educational District, Coimbatore District

¶43

5/6

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

W.P.No.5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5392, 5402 & 5491 of 2020

¶46

R.N.MANJULA, J.

¶47

mrp

¶48

W.P.Nos. 5379, 5381, 5384, 5386, 5387, 5390, 5392, 5393, 5394, 5396 , 5398, 5399, 5402 , & 5491 of 2020 & W.M.P.Nos.24762 & 24763 of 2021

¶49

13.10.2023

¶50

6/6

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

L.Malathi v. The District Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

L.Malathi v. The District Educational Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Selvarani Vs The Government of Tamil Nadu

R.v.Ramavathi Vs The Joint Director of School Education (Nss)

Renganathan Vs The Accountant General (Accounts and Entitlements)

M.Vijaya Vs The Deputy Registrar of Cooperative Societies

A.Ibrahim Vs The Director of Elementary Education

Mr.S.Girija Vs The Accountant general