In this writ petition, the High Court of Madras directed the respondents to settle compensation to the petitioners in accordance with the orders passed in LAOP No.34 of 2001 within twelve weeks.
The respondents were directed to settle compensation in accordance with LAOP No.34 of 2001 within twelve weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP No.5107 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 14-06-2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
WP No.5107 of 2023
1.M.Mala
2.M.Sekar
... Petitioners
Vs.
Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents to pay compensation in the order passed in LAOP No.34 of 2001 dated 08.10.2021 by disposing of the petitioners' representation dated 16.12.2022.
For Petitioners : Ms.M.B.Ramya
Page 1 of 6
WP No.5107 of 2023
For Respondents : Mr.G.Krishna Raja, Additional Government Pleader.
O R D E R
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the respondents to pay compensation in the order passed in LAOP No.34 of 2001 dated 08.10.2021 by disposing of the petitioners' representation dated 16.12.2022.
were acquired for public purposes. The compensation determined by the Land Acquisition Officer was not accepted by the landlosers and they preferred an appeal by way of LAOP No.34 of 2001 before the Sub Court and the Sub Court disposed of the said LAOP on 08.10.2021 and enhanced the compensation.
behalf of the respondents made a submission that the respondents have agreed to settle the compensation as per the orders passed in the LAOP. It is Page 2 of 6
WP No.5107 of 2023
further represented that the entire compensation along with other benefits will be settled in favour of the petitioners, within a period of twelve weeks.
Thiruvannamalai (Cell No.94450 00420), is present before this Court and made a submission that the files have already been submitted before the Head of the Department and forwarded to the Government for consideration.
Page 3 of 6
WP No.5107 of 2023
of. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
14-06-2023
Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn
To
Page 4 of 6
WP No.5107 of 2023
1.The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District.
Page 5 of 6
WP No.5107 of 2023
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.
Svn
WP 5107 of 2023
14-06-2023
Page 6 of 6
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the respondents were directed to settle compensation to the petitioners as per the orders in LAOP No.34 of 2001.
Whether a time limit was established for the completion of settlement of compensation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.Mala
M.Sekar
The District Collector, Office of District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District
The Revenue Divisional Officer (Land Acquisition), Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Thiruvannamalai
S.M.Subramaniam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
