Dismissed

B.Ramani v. The District Collector

Madras HC21 Feb 2023WP/4525/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.4525 of 2023 after the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to approach the court to file an appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

B.Ramani Vs The District Collector — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.4525 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 21.02.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.4525 of 2023

¶7

and W.M.P.No.4530 of 2023

¶8

B.Ramani ... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

1.The District Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

¶11

2.The Competent Authority and Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), National Highways – 205, 3 and 4 Lal Bagudhar Sastri Street, Periakuppam, Tiruvallur District.

¶12

3.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, SRI TOWER, 3^rd Floor, DP-34 (SP) Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in Rc.No.8959-2/2017/F2 (Arbits), dated 30.11.2022, quash the same and consequentially direct to pay the enhanced compensation of a sum of Rs.800 per sq.ft. as per the report of the learned Special District Revenue Officer (LA) at Thiruvallur to the petitioner.

¶14

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.4525 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Chandrasekar

¶17

For Respondents : Mr.Yogesh Kannadasan Special Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 : Mr.Su.Srinivasan Standing Counsel for R3

¶18

O R D E R

¶19

The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner wants to withdraw

¶20

this writ petition with liberty to approach the concerned Court to file an appeal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the impugned order dated 30.11.2022 and has also made an endorsement to that effect in the Court bundle.

¶21

Recording the said submission and the endorsement made, this

¶22

Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed.

¶23

21.02.2023

¶24

Index : Yes / No

¶25

Speaking Order : Yes / No

¶26

Sgl

¶27

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

W.P.No.4525 of 2023

¶29

¶30

1.The District Collector-cum-Arbitrator, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District.

¶31

2.The Competent Authority and Special District Revenue Officer (Land Acquisition), National Highways – 205, 3 and 4 Lal Bagudhar Sastri Street, Periakuppam, Tiruvallur District.

¶32

3.The Project Director, National Highways Authority of India, SRI TOWER, 3^rd Floor, DP-34 (SP) Industrial Estate, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032.

¶33

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.4525 of 2023

R.SURESH KUMAR, J.

Sgl

W.P.No.4525 of 2023

21.02.2023

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

B.Ramani v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ramani v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanmugavalli S Vs Revenue Divisional officer

K.Thangarasu Vs The Sub Registrar

Poovathal Vs The Inspector General of Registration

G.Kaliappan Vs The District Collector

Mr.G.Ravi Vs The Inspector General of Registration

R.Amalan Babu Vs Government of Tamil Nadu