Dr.a. Manimekalan v. The Registrar
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging a notice from the employer in a sexual harassment case quashed as irrelevant since the ICC called the petitioner to attend a hearing.
What did the court decide?
Directed ICC to furnish the complaint dated 08.06.2022 and supporting documents to petitioner before the next hearing.
What the court decided
W.P.No.4189 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 20.02.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
W.P.No.4189 of 2023 & W.M.P.No.4223 of 2023
Dr.A.Manimekalan
... Petitioner
vs.
- 1.The Registrar, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore - 641 046.
2.Dr.B.Sathiyapriya, Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore - 641 046.
3.D.Prabha, Assistant Professor, Department of Environmental Sciences, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore - 641 046. ...Respondents
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the employer has a role to play after an Internal Complaints Committee is constituted for sexual harassment complaints.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Dr.A.Manimekalan
- respondent
The Registrar, Bharathiar University
- respondent
Dr.B.Sathiyapriya
- respondent
D.Prabha
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court