Disposed

The President v. TamilNadu Wakf Board

Madras HC13 Feb 2023WP/4015/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Madras, by a single-judge bench, disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226. The petitioner, elected as a Committee member, sought a direction for the respondent to consider his representation regarding the election of a new managing committee without action for three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 08.02.2022 and dispose of it on merits within three months.

The President Vs TamilNadu Wakf Board — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

Writ Petition No.4015 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated: 13/2/2023

¶4

C O R A M

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

Writ Petition No.4015 of 2023

¶7

The President Military Line Pallivasal Palayamkottai Tirunelveli 627 002.

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

¶10

Tamil Nadu Wakf Board rep. By Chief Executive Officer No.1 Jaffer Syrang Street Vallal Seethakathi Nagar Chennai 1. ... Respondent

¶11

PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶12

praying for the issuance of a writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 8/2/2022.

¶13

For petitioner ... Mr.N.A.Nasir Hussain For respondent ... Mr.G.Mohammed Aseef - - - - -

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

Page No:1/4

¶16

Writ Petition No.4015 of 2023

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondent to consider

¶19

the petitioner's representation dated 8/2/2022.

¶20

Heard Mr.N.A.Nasir Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner.

¶21

Mr.G.Mohmmed Aseef, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent.

¶22

By consent, the writ petition is taken up for final disposal, at the admission stage itself.

¶23

The petitioner is a newly elected Committee member, seeks a direction to the respondent to depute a Wakf official for electing new managing Committee, as per the bye law, scheduled on 4/12/2021. On 20/1/2022, General Body for election was convened and newly elected Committee was sought to be approved for a period from 20/1/2022 to 19/1/2025. Though the respondent acknowledged receipt of the same, no orders are forthcoming. Hence the petitioner has submitted a representation,

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Page No:2/4

¶26

Writ Petition No.4015 of 2023

¶27

dated 8/2/2022. Since the same has not been considered so far, petitioner

¶28

has come forward with the present writ petition praying for the relief as

¶29

stated therein.

¶30

Mr.G.Mohammed Aseef, learned Standing Counsel for the

¶31

respondent submitted that the respondent will consider the representation of the petitioner, at the earliest.

¶32

Submission of the learned Standing Counsel for the Wakf Board is

¶33

recorded.

¶34

Considering the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, respondent shall consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 8/2/2022, and dispose of the same, on merits and in accordance with law, within a

¶35

period of three months, from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶36

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J

¶37

mvs.

¶38

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶39

Page No:3/4

¶40

Writ Petition No.4015 of 2023

¶41

With the above direction, this writ petition is disposed of, at the

¶42

admission stage itself. No costs.

¶43

13/2/2023

¶44

Index : Yes / No Internet: Yes Speaking/non speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No

¶45

mvs.

¶46

W.P.No.4015 of 2023

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No:4/4

The President v. TamilNadu Wakf Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The President v. TamilNadu Wakf Board

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Syed Ameen Ahamed Vs The District collector

Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd., Vs State Industries Promotion

S.Ravindran Vs The Director of Town and Country Planning

A.Paranjothi Vs The Commissioner

E.S.Ramachandran Vs the Commissioner

M/S.Alleance Orchid Mall Pvt. Vs the Industries Commissioner