The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking a directive for the Tahsildar to consider a representation regarding land records. It directed the authority to decide the matter on merits with an opportunity of hearing within eight weeks.
Directed the 3rd respondent to decide the representation on merits after hearing both parties within eight weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.401 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 09.01.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR
W.P.No.401 of 2023
S.Aburvam
... Petitioner
Vs
6.Muthulakshmi ... Respondents
Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the second respondent to consider the representation dated 09.05.2022 made by the petitioner forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.N.Rajagopalan For Respondents : Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi Government Advocate for R1 to R3
W.P.No.401 of 2023
O R D E R
The prayer sought for herein is for a writ of mandamus directing the
second respondent to consider the representation dated 09.05.2022 made by the petitioner forthwith.
W.P.No.401 of 2023
petitioner and Mrs.N.Senthil Selvi, learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents 1 to 3.
W.P.No.401 of 2023
the petitioner dated 09.05.2022 and orders can be passed within a period of
eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
09.01.2023
Index : Yes/No
Speaking Order : Yes/No
Sgl
To
W.P.No.401 of 2023
R.SURESH KUMAR, J.
Sgl
W.P.No.401 of 2023
09.01.2023
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Tahsildar should be directed to consider a representation regarding an alleged error in the computer patta within eight weeks.
Whether notice to private respondents is required when a writ petition involves a dispute between parties and third parties.
S. Aburvam
The District Revenue Officer, Villupuram District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tindivanam Taluk
The Tahsildar, Villupuram District
Sundaram
Thangam
R. Suresh Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
