Disposed

Alliance canal Road Residents v. The District Collector

Madras HC10 Feb 2023WP/3992/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition by a residents welfare association seeking forbearance opening of a TASMAC shop due to potential disturbance to residents. Court directed the District Manager TASMAC to consider previous representations and pass a final order within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed the 5th respondent to pass final orders on the petitioner's representation within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

Alliance canal Road Residents Vs The District Collector — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. No.3992 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 10.02.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

The HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P. No.3992 of 2023 and W.M.P. No.4046 of 2023

¶7

Alliance Canal Road Residents Welfare Association (Regd.) rep. by its Treasurer Babu. .. Petitioner vs 1. The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur.

¶8

The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai – 600 001.

¶9

The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC, No.735, LLA Building 4^th Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006.

¶10

The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., TASMAC, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶11

1/5

¶12

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶13

W.P. No.3992 of 2023

¶14

TASMAC,

¶15

The District Manager, TASMAC, No.1, Bangalore High Road, Thirumazhisai, Sembarambakkam, Thiruvallur East, Chennai – 600 123.

¶16

... Respondents

¶17

Prayer : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ forbearing the respondents their men and people or any Subordinates or any others claiming through them from in any manner locating or opening and functioning a TASMAC retail vending shop at Water Canal Road, Venkateswara Nagar at Plot No.27, 28, Korattur, Chennai – 600 076.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Singaram For Respondents : Mr.S. Ravikumar, Spl. Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.K.Balakrishnan, Standing counsel for R3 to R5

¶19

ORDER

¶20

By consent of both the parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal in the admission stage itself.

¶21

Mr.S.Ravikumar, learned Special Government Pleader accepts

¶22

notice for the 1^st and 2^nd respondents and Mr.K.Balakrishnan, learned

¶23

Standing counsel accepts notice for the respondents 3 to 5.

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

2/5

¶26

W.P. No.3992 of 2023

¶27

The grievance of the petitioner is that if the TASMAC retail vending shop is opened at Water Canal Road, Venkateswara Nagar at Plot Nos.27 and 28, Korattur, Chennai – 600 076, the residents in that area will be affected. According to the petitioner, which is a resident Welfare Association catering to the interest of the residents in that area, there are several places of worship and residences in the subject area, where TASMAC retail vending shop is proposed to be started. The petitioner has given several representations to the respondents including the last representation, dated 08.08.2022 requesting the respondents not to open TASMAC shop in the aforementioned place. Since the representations have not been considered till date, this writ petition has been filed.

¶28

Heard Mr.P.Singaram, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.S.Ravikumar, learned Special Government Pleader for the 1^st and 2^nd respondents and Mr.K.Balakrishnan, learned Standing counsel accepts notice for the respondents 3 to 5.

¶29

On instructions, the learned Standing counsel for the respondents 3 to 5 would submit that as on date, the TASMAC shop has not been opened. He would also submit that since representations have already been given by the petitioner, the respondents will consider the https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 3/5

¶30

W.P. No.3992 of 2023

¶31

same on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶32

No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the representations of the petitioner as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

¶33

For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 5^th respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner's last representation dated 08.08.2022 seeking to forebear the respondents from opening TASMAC retail vending shop at Water Canal Road, Venkateswara Nagar at Plot Nos.27 and 28, Korattur, Chennai – 600 076, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶34

With the aforesaid directions, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶35

10.02.2023

¶36

Index:Yes/No Neutral Citation:Yes/No vsi2

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/5

¶39

W.P. No.3992 of 2023

¶40

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

¶41

vsi2

¶42

¶43

The District Collector, Thiruvallur District, Thiruvallur. 2. The District Collector, Chennai District, Chennai – 600 001. 3. The Senior Regional Manager, TASMAC, No.735, LLA Building 4^th Floor, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006. 4. The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Ltd., TASMAC, Thalamuthu Natarajan Building, Gandhi Irvin Road, Egmore, Chennai – 600 008. 5. The District Manager, TASMAC, No.1, Bangalore High Road, Thirumazhisai, Sembarambakkam, Thiruvallur East, Chennai – 600 123.

¶44

W.P. No.3992 of 2023

¶45

10.02.2023

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

5/5

Alliance canal Road Residents v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Alliance canal Road Residents v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Farwood Industries Limited Vs Assistant commisioner (St)

Tvl. Sri Durga Impex Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St) Fac

M/s.Eagle Earth Movers, Vs The State Tax Officer

Jayaprakash Vs The Income Tax Officer

Rakeshbeniyal Vs The Income Tax officer

Tvl. Itnl - Kmb (J.v) Vs The State Tax officer