Disposed

S.Mangavaram v. The District Collector

Madras HC7 Jul 2023WP/3932/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court disposed of a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking disposal of a representation for Patta issuance. Relying on a previous judgment in WP No.262 of 2018 regarding uniform disposal of similar Patta cases, the court declined to pass a fresh order and dismissed the petition by reference to the existing batch judgment.

What did the court decide?

The present writ petition stands disposed of without a fresh order.

S.Mangavaram Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 07-07-2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM

¶6

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶7

S.Mangavaram

¶8

... Petitioner

¶9

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram District.

¶10

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Villupuram District.

¶11

3.The Regional Development Officer, Office of the Regional Development Officer, Panayapuram,

¶12

Villupuram District.

¶13

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶14

... Respondents

¶15

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶16

Page 1 of 8

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶19

for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents particularly fourth respondent to dispose the representation submitted by the petitioner on 06.12.2022 for issuance of patta or any other alternative land.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Anandha Raj For Respondents : Mr.G.Krishna Raja, Additional Government Pleader.

¶21

O R D E R

¶22

The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the

¶23

respondents, particularly fourth respondent, to dispose the representation submitted by the petitioner on 06.12.2022 for issuance of patta or any other alternative land.

¶24

The issues raised in the present writ petition were

¶25

adjudicated by this Court in a batch of writ petitions in WP No.262 of 2018

¶26

etc. batch [D.Tulasi vs. The District Revenue Officer, Dharmapuri] and

¶27

judgment was delivered on 09.06.2023 and the relevant paragraphs of the said judgment are extracted hereunder:-

¶28

“33. In view of the anomalous situation

¶29

Page 2 of 8

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶32

created on account of the inconsistency in dealing with the grievances of the aggrieved persons, this Court is inclined to pass the following orders:-

¶33

(1) The Commissioner of Land Administration is directed to issue orders to all the competent authorities under his control across the State of Tamil Nadu to maintain registers for entertaining the applications/ representations /appeals filed in a prescribed format by complying with the procedures under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 and the Rules in force.

¶34

(2) Every such application filed by the aggrieved persons are to be registered in the book of register and serial number has to be assigned in the order of seniority and such seniority assigned must be informed/communicated to the applicants/appellants.

¶35

(3) All the applications/appeals by the respective parties are to be taken up for hearing/ enquiry in the order of seniority as far as possible and without causing any discrimination amongst the similarly placed applicants/appellants. Priority for hearing/enquiry is to be granted only if the applicant/appellant is able to establish that there is a genuine urgency, which is to be

¶36

Page 3 of 8

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶39

recorded by the Competent authority, while taking up the matter for hearing/enquiry. All other applications/appeals are to be heard and disposed of in the order of seniority.

¶40

(4) An enquiry under the Patta Pass Book Act, 1983 is to be conducted by the competent authorities by following the procedures as contemplated under the Rules and by affording opportunity to the parties. The competent authorities shall refuse to grant unnecessary adjournments to the parties, who all are intending to prolong and protract the matter. Adjournments are to be granted on genuine grounds only by recording the reasons. Casual adjournments of hearing are to be avoided, which would cause prejudice to any one of the party.

¶41

(5) All applications / appeals are to be disposed of by the competent authorities within a prescribed time limits stipulated under the Government orders or by the Commissioner of Land Administration. In the event of no time limit, the authorities are expected to pass orders within a reasonable period of time i.e., within a period of six months.

¶42

(6) The respondents are directed to relegate

¶43

Page 4 of 8

¶44

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶45

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶46

the parties to the Civil Court of Law, if there is any disputed facts regarding civil rights between the parties exists.

¶47

(7) The respondents are directed not to entertain applications under the Patta Pass Book Act, if the Civil Suits between the parties are pending before the Court of Law. In such circumstances, the applicants/appellants may be granted liberty to approach the competent authorities only after resolving the issues before the Civil Court of Law. The Authorities are directed to keep the revenue proceedings in abeyance till such time the civil disputes reach finality between the parties.

¶48

(8) The Commissioner of Revenue Administration is directed to issue consolidated instructions/circular to all the subordinate officials based on the orders passed by this Court and ensure proper implementation to make the public administration more efficient, since it is a Constitutional mandate.

¶49

(9) The Higher Authorities are directed to conduct periodical review to ensure that the procedures are followed scrupulously and in the event of any lapses, negligence or dereliction of

¶50

Page 5 of 8

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶53

duty on the part of the authorities, appropriate disciplinary actions are to be initiated under the Service Rules.

¶54

(10) The competent authorities are directed to pass speaking orders and communicate the same to all the parties concerned in the manner prescribed under the Rules of Public Administration.”

¶55

In view of the fact that the case of the petitioner is also similar to that of the cases (cited supra ), the present writ petition is also to be considered on the same line.

¶56

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶57

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶58

07-07-2023

¶59

Index : Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking order/Non-Speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No Svn

¶60

Page 6 of 8

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶63

¶64

1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collector, Villupuram District.

¶65

2.The Tahsildar, Office of the Tahsildar, Villupuram District.

¶66

3.The Regional Development Officer, Office of the Regional Development Officer, Panayapuram, Villupuram District.

¶67

4.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Office of the Revenue Divisional Officer, Vikkiravandi Taluk, Villupuram District.

¶68

Page 7 of 8

¶69

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶70

WP No.3932 of 2023

¶71

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

Svn

WP 3932 of 2023

07-07-2023

Page 8 of 8

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

S.Mangavaram v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

S.Mangavaram v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Prakasam alias R.Jayaprakash Vs The Joint sub Registrar

R.Perumalswamy Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

Valluvar Gurukulam Vs State of TamilNadu

A.Baskaran Vs The District Collector

S.Muthukrishnan, Vs Block Development Officer

A. Kumarasamy (Deceased) Vs Dr. Atulya Misra, IAS