The High Court held that the writ petition seeking a direction to dispose of a representation dated 02.11.2015 had become infructuous upon hearing.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.37302 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 07.11.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE D. NAGARJUN Writ Petition.No.37302 of 2015
Dr.C.Sekar ... Petitioner
Vs.
For Petitioner : M/s.K.N.Pandiyan for M/s.S.Vijayakumar For Respondents : M/s.M.Jayanthy, Additional Government Pleader
ORDER
This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioner seeking for direction to the
the first respondent to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 02.11.2015.
1/2
W.P.No.37302 of 2015
Dr.D. NAGARJUN, J.
jai
Mr.K.N.Pandiyan, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the
prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous.
07.11.2023
jai Index:Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No
To
WP.No.37302 of 2015
2/2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be decided on merits when the relief sought has become infructuous due to the representation having already been disposed of.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. C. Sekar
The Principal Secretary to Government. Municipal Administration and Water Supply Department
The Director of Municipal Administration
D. NAGARJUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
