Dismissed

M.Pappathi v. The Chief Medical Officer

Madras HC20 Feb 2023WP/36159/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition challenging the termination of the petitioner's temporary appointment as a X-ray attendant on grounds that her training certificate was from an unapproved institute. The high court held that terminating temporary service based on a defective training certificate could not be faulted and dismissed the petition.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's writ petition dismissed; liberty granted to seek reconsideration if institute is found approved; connected petition closed.

M.Pappathi Vs The Chief Medical Officer — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 20.02.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH

¶6

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

¶7

and WMP No.31111 of 2016

M.Pappathi

...Petitioner

Vs.

The Chief Medical Officer, Veterinary Multi Speciality, Hospital, Bretts Road,

¶12

Salem – 1

¶13

The Regional Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department, Salem -1 ...Respondents

¶14

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, seeking Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the 1^st respondent made in Na.Ka.No.50/2014 dated 05.10.2016 to quash the same.

¶15

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prabakaran

¶16

For Respondents : Mr.D.Gopal Government Advocate for R1 and R2

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Page No.1/5

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

O R D E R

The petitioner was appointed as a X-ray attendar in

¶22

the 1^st respondent / Veterinary Multi Speciality Hospital under Rule 10

¶23

(a) (i) of the Tamil Nadu State and Subordinate Service Rules. The appointment was purely temporary in nature and through the impugned order dated 05.10.2016, her service was terminated. Challenging the same, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶24

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted

¶25

that no enquiry was conducted prior to such termination.

¶26

Per contra, the learned Additional Government

¶27

Pleader submitted that the training certificate submitted by the petitioner herein was found to have been obtained from an unapproved institute and therefore, they were constrained to terminate the service.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Page No.2/5

¶30

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

¶31

It is not in dispute that the petitioner's appointment was temporary in nature under Rule 10 (a) (1) of the Rules. After the appointment of the petitioner herein, her training certificate was sent for scrutiny to the Government and by the report of the Director of Medical Education dated 03.10.2016, the training certificate issued from Thendral Institute of Para medical Sciences, Salem was found to be from an unapproved institute. While that being so, terminating the service of the petitioner, who was only on temporary appointment under 10 (a) (1) of the Rules cannot be found fault with.

¶32

In case, the petitioner is of the view that the training certificate obtained from Thendral Institute of Para medical

¶33

Sciences, is one among the listed institutes, which is approved by the Government, liberty is hereby granted to the petitioner to approach the respondents seeking for reconsideration.

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

Page No.3/5

¶36

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

¶37

As such, the reasoning adopted by the respondents terminating the petitioner cannot be found fault with. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶38

20.02.2023

¶39

rka

¶40

Index:Yes/No Internet:Yes/No

¶41

¶42

The Chief Medical Officer, Veterinary Multi Speciality, Hospital, Bretts Road,

¶43

Salem – 1

¶44

The Regional Joint Director, Animal Husbandry Department,

¶45

Salem -1

¶46

M.S.RAMESH, J.,

¶47

rka

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶49

Page No.4/5

¶50

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

¶51

W.P.No.36159 of 2016

¶52

20.02.2023

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.5/5

M.Pappathi v. The Chief Medical Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M.Pappathi v. The Chief Medical Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Nelson Jerome Vs The Director General of Police

S.Murugan, Vs The Principal Secretary to the Government

C.Krishnan, Village Vs The Secretary to Government

R.Raveendran, Vs The Additional Chief Secretary

V.Kannapurakannan Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

P.Siva, Vs The Superintendent of Police