In this writ petition seeking arrears of salary, the petitioner failed to appear despite listing notice. The High Court dismissed the petition for non-prosecution due to lack of representation on the petitioner's side.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.35287 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.11.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE D.NAGARJUN
W.P.No.35287 of 2015
K.Arjunan
... Petitioner
Vs.
PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the third respondent to pay a sum of Rs.91,320/- (ninety one thousand three hundred and twenty rupees only) a arrears of salary and other allowances with the rate of 18% interest to the petitioner within a period of time.
For petitioner : No appearance For R1 to R2 : Ms.C.Sangamithirai Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.V.Jayaprakash Narayanan
Page No.1 of 4
O R D E R
W.P.No.35287 of 2015
This writ petition is filed seeking for a direction to the third respondent
to pay a sum of Rs.91,320/- towards arrears of salary and other allowances at the rate of 18% interest.
Page No.2 of 4
W.P.No.35287 of 2015
representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today, this matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" even then there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner.
Considering the same, this writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Costs made easy.
16.11.2023
vca
To:
Page No.3 of 4
W.P.No.35287 of 2015
DR. D.NAGARJUN,J.
vca
W.P.No.35287 of 2015
16.11.2023
Page No.4 of 4
K.Arjunan
The District Collector, Thiruvanamalai
The Block Development Officer, Kelpennathur, Thiruvanamalai District
The Panchayath President Somasipadi Village, Thiruvanamalai
DR. D.NAGARJUN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
