Disposed

R.Jayavelu v. the Thasildar

Madras HC20 Dec 2023WP/34691/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This writ petition seeks a direction to survey the petitioner's property following an unconsidered online application. The High Court directed the respondent to consider the application, issue notice, and pass orders on merits within three months.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent to consider the petitioner's online application dated 24.08.2023, pass orders after notice to interested parties, within three months.

R.Jayavelu Vs the Thasildar — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 20.12.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

R.Jayavelu

... Petitioner

versus

The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Vandavasi Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District. .....Respondent

¶11

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to survey the petitioner's Rayatwari house plot property situated at Tiruvannamalai District, Vandavasi Taluk, Kandavaratti Village No.77, Old Survey No.88/14 pa, New Survey and sub-division No.88/21, which is total extent of 120 square meter based on the petitioner's on-line application along with survey fee Challan No.20230824014672, dated 24.08.2023.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Jayanthi

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.P.Gurunathan Additional Government Pleader

¶14

Pg.Nos.1/5

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

¶17

O R D E R

¶18

Mr.P.Gurunathan, learned Additional Government Pleader accepts notice for the respondent. With the consent of both the parties, this Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage, itself.

¶19

The petitioner seeks for a Mandamus directing the respondent to survey his property measuring an extent of 120 sq.mt comprised in Old Survey No.88/14 pa, New Survey and sub-division No.88/21 situated at Tiruvannamalai District, Vandavasi Taluk, Kandavaratti Village No.77, by considering his on-line application along with survey fee Challan No.20230824014672, dated 24.08.2023. Since the said application has not been considered till date, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

¶20

Learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the

¶21

respondent submitted that the respondent will take necessary action on the petitioner's on-line application forthwith.

¶22

Pg.Nos.2/5

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

¶25

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondent to consider the on-line application of the petitioner dated 24.08.2023 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after giving notice to the petitioner and rival claimants/interested parties, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶26

With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

¶27

However, there shall be no order as to costs.

¶28

20.12.2023

¶29

Index: Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No ms

¶30

Pg.Nos.3/5

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

¶33

¶34

The Thasildar, Taluk Office, Vandavasi Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

¶35

Pg.Nos.4/5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

P.VELMURUGAN, J.

W.P.No.34691 of 2023

20.12.2023

Pg.Nos.5/5

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Jayavelu v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Jayavelu v. the Thasildar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baskaran Vs The Chennai Metro Rail Limited

Mohammed Riyasatullah Vs State of Tamil Nadu

A/m.Sri Varadharaja Perumal Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Jayalakshmi Vs the Union Territory of Puducherry

M.Perumal Vs the District Collector

Matheswari Vs the Revenue Divisional Officer