In a certiorarified mandamus seeking to quash an order imposing a fine and denying medical leave, the Court dismissed the petition due to the absence of the petitioner's counsel.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
WP.No.34661/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED 19.09.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN
WP.No.34661/2016
N.Raja Ganapathy
... Petitioner
Versus
Prayer : - Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records connected with the orders dated 12.06.2015, passed by the 2nd respondent in proceedings No.127/4863/D6/TNSTC/2015, quash the same and also direct the respondents to sanction Medical Leave for the above period from 14.02.2015 to 23.03.2015 and pay leave salary of about Rs.26,000/- therefor.
For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Babu, Standing counsel
ORDER
1
WP.No.34661/2016
19.09.2023
AP Internet : Yes
To
2
WP.No.34661/2016
1.The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Salem [Ltd], Salem 636 007.
3
WP.No.34661/2016
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.,
AP
WP.No.34661/2016
19.09.2023
4
N. Raja Ganapathy
The Managing Director Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Salem [Ltd], Salem
The General Manager Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation Salem [Ltd], Salem
C. V. Karthikeyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
