Dismissed

G.Velu, S/o.Govindasamy Reddy, v. The Secretary

Madras HC5 Jan 2023WP/33899/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking a writ of certiorari and mandamus to quash a specific order, declare him the elected president of a Village Panchayat, and direct the respondent to allow him to assume office. The court held that the period specified has elapsed, rendering the petition infructuous.

What did the court decide?

Dismissed the writ petition as infructuous with no costs and closed connected miscellaneous petitions.

G.Velu, S/o.Govindasamy Reddy, Vs The Secretary — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.33899 of 2015

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 05.01.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.33899 of 2015

¶7

¶8

M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015

G.Velu

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Secretary The State Election Commission Arumbakkam

¶13

Chennai-600 106

¶14

2.The District Collector Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶15

3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat Tiruvallur

¶16

4.The Block Development Officer Pallipattu Pallipattu Taluk Tiruvallur District

¶17

5.N.Velu ... Respondents

¶18

PRAYER: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified mandamus calling for the records of

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶20

Page 1 of 4

¶21

W.P.No.33899 of 2015

¶22

the 2^nd respondent in Se.Mu.KA.No.2028/2012/PC1 dt 03.09.2015 quash the same, consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to declare the petitioner as the elected president of Kumrarajupettai Village Panchayat, Pallipattu Taluk, Tirvullaur District and to allow the petitioner to assume office of the President of the said Panchayat.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.A.Sivaji

¶24

For Respondents : Mr.B.Neduncheziyan for R1

¶25

Mr.N.Naveenkumar,

¶26

Govt.Advocate for R2 to 4

¶27

MR.Vijayakumar for R5

¶28

O R D E R

¶29

Writ petition is filed seeking to call for the records of the 2^nd respondent in Se.Mu.KA.No.2028/2012/PC1 dt 03.09.2015 quash the same, consequently direct the 2^nd respondent to declare the petitioner as the elected president of Kumrarajupettai Village Panchayat, Pallipattu Taluk, Tirvullaur District and to allow the petitioner to assume office of the President of the said Panchayat.

¶30

This Writ Petition is filed seeking to direct the 2^nd respondent to

¶31

declare the petitioner as the elected president of Kumararajapettai Village Panchayat, Pallipattu Taluk, Tiruvallur District for the year 2015.

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶33

Page 2 of 4

¶34

W.P.No.33899 of 2015

¶35

Now the period is already over and nothing survives for consideration in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

¶36

05.01.2023

¶37

kpr Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No To 1.The Secretary The State Election Commission Arumbakkam Chennai-600 106

¶38

2.The District Collector Tiruvallur District Tiruvallur

¶39

3.The Assistant Director of Panchayat Tiruvallur

¶40

4.The Block Development Officer Pallipattu Pallipattu Taluk Tiruvallur District

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶42

Page 3 of 4

¶43

W.P.No.33899 of 2015

¶44

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶45

kpr

¶46

W.P.No.33899 of 2015 & M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2015

¶47

05.01.2023

¶48

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis __________

¶49

_________ Page 4 of 4_

G.Velu, S/o.Govindasamy Reddy, v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G.Velu, S/o.Govindasamy Reddy, v. The Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

M/s.Haven Infra Projects and Power Limited Vs The Regional Transport Authority

M/s.Avon Plastics, Vs The Special Tahsildar

S.Rajkumar Vs The Commissioner

K.Vasudevan Vs The District Collector

Tmt. a.Sudha Arul, Vs The Inspector of Panchayats /

Tmt.Jaya Vs The District Collector