Dismissed

K.Vijhay Saai v. The Commissioner of Police

Madras HC9 Nov 2023WP/33567/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court President dismissed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution. Noting that the respondent authorities had already registered an FIR (Crime No.218 of 2018) which was closed as a mistake of fact, the court held the petition unnecessary and closed it without granting orders.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was closed without any orders being passed as of costs.

K.Vijhay Saai Vs The Commissioner of Police — Consumer Protection | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 09.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

K.Vijhay Saai

...Petitioner

-Vs-

The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Chennai – 600 007.

¶11

The Additional Director General of Police, State C.B (C.I.D), Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶12

The Inspector General of Police, State C.B(C.I.D), Egmore, Chennai – 600 0008.

¶13

The Director, Vigilance and Anti-corruption Department (DVAC)

¶14

No.293, M.K.N.Road,

¶15

Alandur, Chennai – 600 016.

¶16

The Commissioner, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department,

¶17

Ezilagam, Fourth Floor,

¶18

Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Page 1 of 6

¶21

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

¶22

The Assistant Commissioner, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department,

¶23

Thousand Light Zone, Vidyodaya Main Road, Kodambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶24

The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Team-I, Office of Commissioner of Police,

¶25

Vepery, Chennai – 600 007. (R7 Suo Motu impleaded vide Order dated 16.02.2021 made in W.P.No.33567 of 2017)

¶26

... Respondents

¶27

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents herein to register an FIR in respect of Tatkal Ration Cards issued against receipts 1. Serial No.044086 dated 20.08.2010 2. Serial No.044087 dated 24.08.2010 3. Serial No.044088 dated 24.08.2010 4. Serial No.044089 dated 24.08.2010 5. Serial No.044090 dated 24.08.2010 6. Serial No.044091 dated 24.08.2010 7. Serial No.044092 dated 24.08.2010 8. Serial No.044093 dated 20.08.2010 9. Serial No.044094 dated 24.08.2010 10. Serial No.044095 dated 24.08.2010 11. Serial No.044096 dated 25.08.2010 12. Serial No.044097 dated 25.08.2010 13. Serial No.044098 dated 25.08.2010 14. Serial No.044099 dated 25.08.2010 15. Serial No.044100 dated 25.08.2010 and further direct fair and independent investigation of the offence.

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

Page 2 of 6

¶30

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

¶31

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.L.Baskaran Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

¶32

ORDER

¶33

The writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to

¶34

register an FIR in respect of Tatkal Ration Cards issued and further direct fair and independent investigation of the offence.

¶35

The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for

¶36

the respondents submitted on the complaint lodged by the petitioner, an FIR has been registered in Crime No.218 of 2018 and after investigation the same was closed as mistake of fact on 16.03.2022. The closure report was also filed before the learned Metropolitan Magistrate (CCB & CBCID), Egmore, Chennai. In fact, the said closure report was challenged by the petitioner and the same was dismissed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, in Crl.M.P.No.17265 of 2021, dated 25.11.2022, by accepting the closure report.

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

Page 3 of 6

¶39

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

¶40

Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is

¶41

closed. There shall be no orders as to costs.

¶42

09.11.2023

¶43

Internet: Yes Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order

¶44

rts

¶45

¶46

The Commissioner of Police, Chennai City, Chennai – 600 007.

¶47

The Additional Director General of Police, State C.B (C.I.D), Egmore, Chennai – 600 008.

¶48

The Inspector General of Police, State C.B(C.I.D), Egmore, Chennai – 600 0008.

¶49

The Director, Vigilance and Anti-corruption Department (DVAC)

¶50

No.293, M.K.N.Road,

¶51

Alandur, Chennai – 600 016.

¶52

The Commissioner, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department, Ezilagam, Fourth Floor, Chepauk, Chennai – 600 005.

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶54

Page 4 of 6

¶55

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

¶56

The Assistant Commissioner, Civil Supplies and Consumer Protection Department,

¶57

Thousand Light Zone, Vidyodaya Main Road, Kodambakkam High Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034.

¶58

The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch, Team-I, Office of Commissioner of Police,

¶59

Vepery, Chennai – 600 007.

¶60

The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

¶61

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶62

Page 5 of 6

¶63

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

¶64

G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J,

rts

W.P.No.33567 of 2017

09.11.2023

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶69

Page 6 of 6

K.Vijhay Saai v. The Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Vijhay Saai v. The Commissioner of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Susil Lalwani Vs State Rep.by

Susanth Karalapadi Vs the Inspector of Police

R.P.Poorani Vs E.Mohankumar

Mrs.a.R.Lakshmi Vs Mr.S.Neelankantan

A.Hemamalini Vs State Rep.by

K.Raghavan Vs the State by