Dismissed

Shanmugam v. the Superintendent of Police

Madras HC8 Nov 2023WP/31905/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment dismissed a writ petition. The court rejected the request for police protection to survey properties because the survey numbers sought for measurement did not match those specified in the compromise decree. The petitioner is directed to approach the appropriate authorities with proper documents.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was dismissed; no costs awarded.

Shanmugam Vs the Superintendent of Police — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. No.31905 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

Dated : 08.11.2023

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN

¶6

W.P. No.31905 of 2023

Shanmugam

... Petitioner

-vs-

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirupattur, Thirupattur District.

¶11

2.The Station House Officer, Kandili Police Station, Kandili Village, Tirupattur Taluk and District.

¶12

3.Tahsildar, Tirupattur Taluk & District.

¶13

4.Vinmathi

¶14

5.Pushparaj

¶15

6.Yuvaraj

¶16

7.Shalini

¶17

...Respondents

¶18

PRAYER : Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 & 2 to grant police protection to the 3^rd respondent for survey, measure and demarcate the property ad measuring 44 ½ cents comprised in Sy. No.54/2D, 37 ¼ cents

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

Page No.1/4

¶21

W.P. No.31905 of 2023

¶22

comprised in SY. No.51/4 and the property ad measuring 16 ½ cents with 1/3^rd right in the well and channel right and electricity service connection comprised in Sy. No.51/6 situated at Kaisnaykanpatti Village, Kandili Panchayat Union, Tirupattur Taluk and District.

¶23

For Petitioner : Mr.B.Rajarajan

¶24

For Respondents 1 to 3 : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

¶25

ORDER

¶26

The Writ Petition is filed seeking police protection to measure and

¶27

demarcate the properties mentioned in the Writ Petition. Based on the compromise decree, the petitioner herein wants to demarcate the property. The surveyor has given notice to the parties, calling for objection if any, for measuring the land.

¶28

It appears that the survey number sought to be measured and demarcated differs from survey number found in the compromise decree and therefore, no action is to be taken on the representation of the petitioner.

¶29

In view of the above facts, this Court finds no reason to entertain the writ petition and it is open to the petitioner herein to make proper representation to the appropriate authority namely Tahsildar and Surveyor for measuring the lands with all necessary documents and if they are satisfied, the

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

Page No.2/4

¶32

W.P. No.31905 of 2023

¶33

surveyor can measure the land and demarcate it and in case if there is any disturbance, the police shall act on the request of the surveyor in accordance

¶34

with law .

¶35

4. With the above observation, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶36

08.11.2023

¶37

Internet : Yes/No Index : Yes/No rkp

¶38

¶39

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirupattur, Thirupattur District.

¶40

2.The Station House Officer, Kandili Police Station, Kandili Village, Tirupattur Taluk and District.

¶41

3.Tahsildar, Tirupattur Taluk & District.

¶42

The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Madras.

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.3/4

¶44

W.P. No.31905 of 2023

¶45

Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J.

¶46

rkp

¶47

W.P.No.31905 of 2023

¶48

08.11.2023

¶49

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page No.4/4

Shanmugam v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanmugam v. the Superintendent of Police

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subash Chand Jain Vs Tamilnadu News Print and Paper Limited

J.D.John Samuel Vs the Commissioner of Police

Immanuel Vasanth Raj Vs Inspector of Police

Prof.Dr.E.Balagurusamy Vs K.P.Anbalagan

Karthik Vyas Vs Gopalji Agarwar

Duraimurugan Vs the Director General of Police