The High Court of Madras dismissed this writ petition as infructuous upon the submission that the relief sought regarding the sale of property had become impermissible or unserviceable.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.308 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.03.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.308 of 2019
E.Thulasi
...Petitioner
Vs.
Petition filed Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to take action on the petitioner representation dated 10.10.2018 to sell the above said property in pursuance of Sec 20 & 21 of the above said the Tamil Nadu Maintenance and Welfare of Parents
1/4
W.P.No.308 of 2019
and Senior Citizens Rules 2009.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Kanagaraj
For Respondents : M/s.Senthil Selvi, Government Advocate, for R1 to R4 : M/s.R.P.Paneer Selvam, for R5 & R6
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this Writ Petition has become infructuous and nothing survives for further adjudication.
for the petitioner, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
07.03.2023
skt
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No
2/4
W.P.No.308 of 2019
To
Pattinambakkam, Chennai - 28.
3/4
W.P.No.308 of 2019
M.DHANDAPANI, J.
skt
W.P.No.308 of 2019
07.03.2023
4/4
2 provisions across 2 enactments
E.Thulasi
The District Collector, Singaravelar Maligai, Rajaji Salai, Chennai - 600 001
M.DHANDAPANI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
