Disposed

R.Rajmohan, v. the Chairman

Madras HC16 Oct 2023WP/29994/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court issued a single formula writ permitting the petitioner to carry on quarrying operations until April 27, 2024. This permission was granted despite the pending re-appraisal of the environmental clearance by the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority following the abolition of the District Authority.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to quarry till 27.04.2024 subject to strict compliance with Board conditions; applicant directed to apply for re-appraisal within two weeks.

R.Rajmohan, Vs the Chairman — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 16.10.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE N.MALA

¶6

W.P.No. 29994 of 2023 and W.M.P.No. 29621 of 2023

¶7

R.Rajmohan ... Petitioner

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai~600 032.

¶10

2.State Environment Impact Assessment Authority No.9, Jeenis Road Saidapet, Chennai 15

¶11

3.The District Collector Salem District Salem

¶12

The Deputy Director Department of Geology and Mining Salem ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the 4^th respondent to permit the petitioner herein to carry on quarrying operation in the land measuring 1.25.00 Hectares,

¶14

Page No:1/7

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶17

comprised in Survey No.35/3(Part), Eripudur Village, Valapadi Taluk, Salem District by issuing necessary transport permits until the date of expiry of environmental clearance obtained from the District Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority vide Lr.No.DEIAA— DIA/TN/MIN/18938/2018-SLM-E.C.No.58/2018 dated 05.12.2018 i.e 26.01.2026, without insisting environmental clearance appraised by SEIAA.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.V.P. Sengottuvel Senior Counsel for Mr. P.S. Prabhu For Respondents : Mrs. Shanmugavalli Sekar for R1 Standing Counsel Mr. K.Srinivasamoorthy Central Government Standing Counsel Mrs. Mythreye Chandru Special Government Pleader for R3&R4

¶19

ORDER

¶20

(Order of the Court was made by J.Nisha Banu,J.)

¶21

The petitioner was granted quarry lease on 04.08.2020 and the same was granted for a period of ten (10) years from 27.01.2021 to 26.01.2031. The Environmental clearance for the said project was granted by the District Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (DEIAA) for a period of 5 years from the date of execution of the Quarry Lease Agreement. Therefore,

¶22

Page No:2/7

¶23

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶24

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶25

the clearance granted to the petitioner is valid upto 27.04.2024.

¶26

2.The petitioner submitted his application for consent to operate under The Air ( Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and The Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and the same came to be granted by the 1^st respondent vide Proceedings dated 13.03.2020 and renewed vide Consent Order dated 13.03.2020. In the meantime, the DEIAA was abolished and the power was vested with the State Environmental Impact Assessment Authority. An order was passed by the National Green Tribunal in

¶27

O.A.No.142 of 2022 directing all clearances given by DEIAA to be reappraised by SEAC/SEIAA. This order was passed on 07.12.2022.

¶28

3.On account of the fact the re-appraisal was not done by the SEIAA, clearance was not given. Hence the present Writ Petition.

¶29

On the above submissions, Mr.K.Srinivasamoorthy, learned Central Government Standing Counsel appearing for the SEIAA submits that it will take minimum period of three (3) weeks for re-appraisal. He would further

¶30

Page No:3/7

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶33

submit that the petitioner has to apply for re-appraisal well within the time, along with the hard copy of the application, which has not been done by the petitioner till date.

¶34

In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the submission of the petitioner that the 4^th respondent refused to issue transport permit for the petitioner's quarry despite holding a valid Environment Clearance as on date and necessary Consent to Operate, from the 1^st respondent and also taking into consideration that the environmental clearance is valid upto 27.04.2024, we permit the petitioner to quarry till 27.04.2024. We make it clear that all the conditions stipulated by the Pollution Control Board and DEIAA must be strictly complied with. In the meantime, the petitioner has to apply for re-appraisal before the SEIAA with all relevant documents, within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶35

If the petitioner applies for extension of lease, this order will not

¶36

Page No:4/7

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶39

enure in his favour, for its co-terminus with the DEIAA approval i.e. Till 27.04.2024. The petitioner will not be entitled to quarry after the said date without clearance from the Pollution Control Board and SEIAA and a valid lease.

¶40

This writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶41

16.10.2023 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes/No Internet:Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No Jer

¶42

Page No:5/7

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶45

¶46

1.The Chairman Tamil Nadu Pollution Control Board, No.76, Mount Salai, Guindy, Chennai~600 032.

¶47

2.The State Environment Impact Assessment Authority No.9, Jeenis Road Saidapet, Chennai 15

¶48

3.The District Collector Salem District Salem

¶49

The Deputy Director Department of Geology and Mining Salem

¶50

Page No:6/7

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

W.P.No.29994 of 2023

¶53

J.NISHA BANU,J. and N.MALA,J.

¶54

Jer

¶55

W.P.No. 29994 of 2023 and W.M.P.No. 29621 of 2023

¶56

16.10.2023

¶57

Page No:7/7

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Rajmohan, v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Rajmohan, v. the Chairman

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.S.Balaji, Vs Chennai Metropolitan

Tindivanam Nagara Siru, Kuru Vyabarigal Nala Sangam, Vs The Town Vending Committee

A.Mohanraj Vs the State of Tamil Nadu

M.Chinnu Vs The Commissioner

R.Nanjundan Vs District Collector

M.Sadasivam Vs Union of India