V.Ponnusamy v. The Govt of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
This common order in two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was disposed of as closed. The court noted that the revision petitions sought to be reviewed had already been disposed of by the impugned authority on 04.09.2019 and were communicated to the petitioner, leaving no matter for adjudication in the writ petitions.
What did the court decide?
No order as to costs. Writ petitions closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos.29540 & 29547 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 05.06.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
W.P.Nos. 29540 & 29547 of 2018
V.Ponnusamy ... Petitioner in both W.P.'s
Versus
- 1.The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department,
- Secretariat, Chennai-600 009.
- 2.The Commissioner of Municipal Administration, Chepauk, Chennai-600 005.
3.The Commissioner, Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation, Tirunelveli-627 001. ... Respondents in both W.P.'s
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
V. Ponnusamy
- respondent
The Government of Tamilnadu, Rep. by Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration & Water Supply Department
- respondent
The Commissioner of Municipal Administration
- respondent
The Commissioner, Tirunelveli City Municipal Corporation
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court