Masjid E-Khadeem Management committee v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.2919 of 2023
R.MAHADEVAN, J. AND MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ, J.
(Order of the court was made by R.MAHADEVAN, J.)
At the instance of the learned counsel for the respondents, this matter has been listed today under the caption “for being mentioned”.
- Heard Mr.M.Venkadesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 7, Mr.K.Sathyabal, learned counsel for respondents 8, 10, 13, 15 & 16 and Mr.V.Balakrishnan, learned counsel for respondents 9, 11, 12 & 14.
- The respective counsel for respondents 8 to 16 submitted that the authorities are taking action only against the selective parties and they have not issued notices to all the parties concerned.
- In reply, Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, learned Standing Counsel submitted that notices will be issued to all the encroachers, whether it is hut or a pucca building and appropriate steps will be taken for removal of such encroachments after following due process of law.
- The above statement of Mrs.P.T.Ramadevi, learned Standing Counsel, is recorded. Accordingly, this matter stands clarified and no further order needs to be passed herein.
nsd
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Petitioner
- respondent
Respondents 1 to 7
- respondent
Respondents 8, 10, 13, 15 & 16
- respondent
Respondents 9, 11, 12 & 14
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court