S.Thangaraj, v. The Princiapl Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition challenging construction of a fertilizer unit on land gifted for a park was closed after respondent municipality identified alternative land for a micro compost yard, eliminating the apprehension.
What did the court decide?
No costs. The writ petition stands closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.28511 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.02.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN and
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAMMED SHAFFIQ
Writ Petition No. 28511 of 2018
and W.M.P No. 33258 of 2018
S.Thangaraj .. Petitioner
Versus
- The Principal Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu, George Fort,
- Chennai.
- The District Collector, Erode District, Erode.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Thangaraj
- respondent
The Commissioner, Puliyampatti Municipality
Coram
R. MAHADEVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court