G.Kumar v. The Commissioner
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras, upon finding that the petitioner had no instructions to prosecute the writ petition, dismissed it for non-prosecution without engaging with the substantive prayer regarding land use.
What the court decided
W.P. No. 2831 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.12.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.D. AUDIKESAVALU
W.P. No. 2831 of 2023 and
W.M.P. No. 2831 of 2023
G.Kumar
… Petitioner
-vs-
- The Commissioner, Tambaram Municipal Corporation, Tambaram, Chennai – 600045. (R2 deleted from the array of party Respondents vide order dated 12.07.2023 in W.P. No. 2831 of 2023) ... Respondent
Prayer:- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus, forbearing the Respondents namely the Commissioner, Tambaram Municipal Corporation, Tambaram, Chennai – 600045, the First Respondent herein and the Chairman-cum-Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Water & Sewerage Board, TWAD House, 4th Floor, 5, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 600005, the Second Respondent herein ord any other person claiming under them to enter and alter the land measuring 4 Ares in Survey Number 132/30 of Pammal Village approved as Park Area or for any other purposes especially for sewerage pumping station.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G.Kumar
- respondent
The Commissioner, Tambaram Municipal Corporation
Coram
P.D. Audikesavalu
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court