Disposed
Mohamed Dada v. The District Collector
Madras HCWP/2770/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
In a writ petition under Article 226, the petitioner sought a mandamus to restrain official respondents from constructing a Public Toilet on his private property. The Court found that the Public Toilet was already being constructed in Survey No.377 and not in the petitioner's property (Survey No.378/3C and 378/3D), thereby allaying the petitioner's apprehension. Consequently, the Petitioner's grie
What did the court decide?
Direction was issued to the respondents not to encroach upon the petitioner's property in Survey No.378/3C and 378/3D, instructing that the Public Toilet construction shall be confined to Survey No.37