L.Sarala v. Public Information Commission
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 seeking directions for the 2nd respondent to inquire into a complaint and take action against the 1st respondent under the RTI Act. The court ordered the respondent to furnish details and disposed of the petition.
What did the court decide?
The 2nd respondent is required to furnish the details sought by the petitioner and the matter is posted for reporting compliance.