Disposed

B.Ramakrishnan, v. The Assistant Settlement Officer (North)

Madras HC14 Dec 2023WP/25649/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought a writ of Mandamus directing respondents to implement a previous order granting patta for specific land by making necessary changes in accounts. The Court directed the respondents to consider the representation and pass orders on merits within 15 days.

What did the court decide?

Direction issued to respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019, implement the earlier order granting patta, and pass orders on merits within 15 days.

B.Ramakrishnan, Vs The Assistant Settlement Officer (North) — Land Acquisition | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 14.12.2023

¶4

Coram:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN

¶6

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

B.Ramakrishnan

... Petitioner

Vs.

The Assistant Settlement Officer (North) Office of the Principal Secretary Commissioner of Land Survey & Settlement Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005

¶11

The District Collector Office of the Collectorate Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District

¶12

The Tahsildar Taluk Office Cheyyur, Kancheepuram District ... Respondents

¶13

Prayer : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents and their officers to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019 and to implement the order granting patta passed by the 1st respondent vide Ref.No.SR17/11 E2/5334/2011 dated 06.02.2012 and the 3rd respondent vide his proceedings Na.Ka.No.3443/2013 dated 23.03.2015 and Na.Ka.No.3443/2017/A2 09.06.2017 respectively by making necessary changes in the village and

¶14

1/6

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶17

taluk accounts as per the direction of the order passed in W.P.No.25207 of 2014 dated 02.03.2015 and thereby issue patta in respect of the land measuring an extent of 8.29 hectares, comprised in Survey No.233, situated at Kokkaranthangal Village (Arcot Unit), Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram District.

¶18

For Petitioner : Mr.M.Senthil Vadivu

¶19

For Respondents : Mr.P.Gurunathan Additional Government Pleader

¶20

ORDER

¶21

This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents and their officers to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019 and to implement the order granting patta passed by the 1st respondent vide Ref.No.SR17/11 E2/5334/2011 dated

¶22

06.02.2012 and the 3rd respondent vide his proceedings Na.Ka.No.3443/2013 dated 23.03.2015 and Na.Ka.No.3443/2017/A2 09.06.2017 respectively by making necessary changes in the village and taluk accounts as per the direction of the order passed in W.P.No.25207 of 2014 dated 02.03.2015 and thereby issue patta in respect of the land measuring an extent of 8.29 hectares, comprised in Survey No.233, situated at Kokkaranthangal Village (Arcot Unit), Cheyyur Taluk, Kancheepuram

¶23

2/6

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶26

District.

¶27

2.Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it would suffice, if a direction is issued to the respondents to consider and pass orders on the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019 and to issue patta, within a stipulated time as may be fixed by this Court.

¶28

3.Mr.P.Gurunathan, learned Additional Government Pleader, who takes notice for the respondents submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019 and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law within a stipulated time.

¶29

Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side and taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 15.04.2019 and implement the order of the 1st respondent if the petitioner is otherwise eligible and pass orders on merits and

¶30

3/6

¶31

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶32

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶33

in accordance with law within 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of

¶34

this order.

¶35

With the above directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There

¶36

shall be no order as to costs.

¶37

14.12.2023 (2/2)

¶38

ksa-2 Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No

¶39

Note: Issue Order Copy on 15.12.2023

¶40

4/6

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶43

¶44

The Assistant Settlement Officer (North) Office of the Principal Secretary Commissioner of Land Survey & Settlement

¶45

Chepauk, Chennai - 600 005

¶46

The District Collector Office of the Collectorate Kancheepuram Kancheepuram District

¶47

The Tahsildar Taluk Office

¶48

Cheyyur, Kancheepuram District

¶49

5/6

¶50

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶51

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶52

P.VELMURUGAN. J.

¶53

Ksa-2

¶54

W.P. No.25649 of 2019

¶55

14.12.2023 (2/2)

¶56

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶57

6/6

B.Ramakrishnan, v. The Assistant Settlement Officer (North)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

B.Ramakrishnan, v. The Assistant Settlement Officer (North)

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

N.Ponsingh, Vs The State

Amita Patel, Vs The State of Tamil Nadu

N.Ethiraj Vs The Principal Secretary to

L.K.Jayasekar(Deceased), Vs The Chief Controlling

B.Rajendran Vs The Assistant Settlement Officer (North)

P.Sivagami Vs the State of Tamilnadu