Dismissed

Mohamed Sadiq Basha v. The District Collector

Madras HC2 Jan 2023WP/25342/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court stayed a writ petition filed under Article 226 challenging the sale of plots without Building Rule approvals. On hearing, the petitioner withdrew the petition with liberty to approach the Civil Court. Consequently, the petition was dismissed with liberty to agitate the issue.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition stands withdrawn as dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to agitate the issue before the Civil Court.

Mohamed Sadiq Basha Vs The District Collector — Property and Title | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.25342 of 2016

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 02.01.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR

¶6

W.P.No.25342 of 2016 and W.M.P.No.21654 of 2016

Mohamed Sadiq Basha

... Petitioner

Versus

The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore – 607 001

¶11

2.The President Manjakuhi Panchayat Manjakuzhi Bhuvanagiri Taluk Cuddalore District

¶12

3.The Commissioner Parangipettai Panchayat Union Parangipettai, Bhuvanagiri Taluk Cuddalore District

¶13

4.Sub-Registrar Parangipettai

¶14

5.The Registrar Chidambaram

¶15

6.Abdul Ghafoor

¶16

7.Pyari Beevi @ Massa Beevi

¶17

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.25342 of 2016

8.Mohammed Rafi

... Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 5 not to permit the sale of plots in S.No.124/4 southern 66 cents in Manjakuzhi Village, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District, except after obtaining due approval under the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Building Rules, 1997.

¶22

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Baskar

¶23

For Respondents : Mr.Naveen Kumar for R1, 4 & 5 Mr.S.V.Durai Solaimalai for R2 & 3 Mr.B.Manimaran for R6, 7 & 8

¶24

ORDER

¶25

This petition has been filed seeking to direct the respondents 1 to 5 not to

¶26

permit the sale of plots in S.No.124/4 southern 66 cents in Manjakuzhi Village, Bhuvanagiri Taluk, Cuddalore District, except after obtaining due approval

¶27

under the Tamil Nadu Panchayat Building Rules, 1997.

¶28

After elaborate hearing on both sides, when this Court was about to dismiss the petition, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks this Court to withdraw this writ petition with a liberty to canvass the issues before the Civil Court.

¶29

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶30

W.P.No.25342 of 2016

¶31

Accordingly, this writ petition stands withdrawn as dismissed with a

¶32

liberty to the petitioner to agitate the issue before the Civil Court. No costs.

¶33

Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶34

02.01.2023

¶35

Index : Yes/No dhk To

¶36

The District Collector Cuddalore District Cuddalore – 607 001

¶37

2.Sub-Registrar Parangipettai 3.The Registrar Chidambaram

¶38

N. SATHISH KUMAR, J.

¶39

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.25342 of 2016

dhk

W.P.No.25342 of 2016

02.01.2023

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Mohamed Sadiq Basha v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mohamed Sadiq Basha v. The District Collector

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Arulmigu Thiruvalleeswarar Vs The Commissioner

Andimadam Village Panchayat Vs The Principal Secretary to

Siddarth Galada, Vs The Commissioner

M.Narashiman, Vs the Commissioner

Sri Kasiviswanathar Temple Vs Hindu Religious & Charitable

A.Saravanan, Vs The District Collector-cum-