P.Karnan v. The Collector
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners challenged eviction of slum dweller occupants by CMDA. The Court dismissed the petition because the respondents consented to consider eligible petitioners for housing allotment, rendering interdictory relief impermissible.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition dismissing with no costs.
What the court decided
W.P.No.24505 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 11.07.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
W.P.No.24505 of 2015 & W.M.P.No.1 of 201
1.P.Karnan 2.D.Myvizhi 3.A.Rajan 4.P.Maheshwari 5.S.Devi 6.M.Jagadeesan 7.K.Sundarraj 8.P.Devi 9.C.Sekar 10.M.Bhaskar 11.J.Udaya Kumar 12.J.Ravi Kumar 13.D.Komala 14.Nagammal 15.J.Jaydhabee 16.S.Nashreen 17.Bhagavathi 18.Muthammal 19.Uma Maheshwari 20.Thajudeen 21.Shabana 22.M.Thajunisha 23.V.Latha 24.Nalla Thambi
1/8
W.P.No.24505 of 2015
25.Chitra 26.Ramamoorthy 27.Raja Sekar 28.Sankar 29.Gopi 30.Mahalakshmi 31.Mohana 32.Sarathy 33.Santhi 34.Vijayalakshmi 35.Durai Raji 36.Deva Raj 37.P.Balasubramaniyan 38.M.Lakshni 39.Thangavel 40.Vijaylakshmi 41.B.Pauunu 42.Mohanakrishnan 43.Mathu Mathim 44.Dhanalakshmi 45.Ramalingam 46.Chandra 47.Muthulingam 48.Sanjay Gandhi 49.Kalirajan ...Petitioners Vs. 1.The Collector, O/o. The Collectorate, Thiruvallur District.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
1.P.Karnan and others
- respondent
1.The Collector, O/o. The Collectorate, Thiruvallur District
- respondent
2.The Tahsildar, O/o, Tahsildar, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District
- respondent
3.The Member Secretary, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority
- respondent
4.The Principal Secretary, Tamil Nadu Urban Habitat Development Board
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court