M/S.Daily Whole Sale Vs Foreman — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

M/S.Daily Whole Sale Vs Foreman — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2023)

S.No	Dates	Events
1	24.03.2011	Chit arbitration court summon has been acknowledged as served on the petitioner - postal acknowledgment is available on file.
2	02.05.2011
3	24.05.2011	No appearance of the petitioner.
4	14.06.2011
5	06.07.2011
6	26.07.2011
7	11.08.2011	Paper publication. The original of the advertisement is produced before the Court which contains the name of the petitioner.
8	30.08.2011	The foremen was asked to file declaration in regard to confirmation of service which was filed on 14.09.2011 On the same date the Chit Arbitrator had passed the decree adverse to the petitioner.

S.No	Dates	Events
1	31.08.2005	Chit Arbitration Court first summons have been issued to the petitioner
2	05.10.2005	Chit arbitration Court second summons have been issued to the petitioner.
3	07.11.2005	Second Summons had been returned by the postal authorities. The matter was adjourned to 12.12.2005. Publication was directed to taken in the mean while.
4	12.12.2005	Paper publication was effected. Original advertisement is produced before this Court. Upon receipt of declaration of service, an award was passed on 12.12.2005.

S.No	Dates	Events
1	31.08.2005	First summons issued. Postal acknowledgment received.
2	05.10.2005	Second summons that was served was returned by postal authorities.
3	07.11.2005	One more summons sent
4	29.11.2005	Summons was returned by the postal authorities. Original records have been produced before the Court. Paper publication effected on 01.03.2006. Original file is produced before the Court which contains the name of the petitioner.