This order dismisses seven Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a promotion memorandum. The petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution as no representatives appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the listing dates in August and September 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.Nos.22953 to 22959 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.09.2023
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
W.P.Nos.22953 to 22959 of 2008 and MP.Nos.1 & 2 of 2008 (7 Nos.) and 1 of 2010 (7 Nos.)
WP.No.22953 of 2008
PRAYER: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India p raying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned memorandum bearing Na.Ka.No.6488/Aa1/2008 dated 22.07.2008 issued by the first respondent quash the same insofar as it relates to respondents 2 to 9 herein and consequently direct the first respondent to consider the
1/4
Officer.
W.P.Nos.22953 to 22959 of 2008
petitioner for being promoted to the post of Assistant Divisional Fire Officer.
For Petitioner in all WP's : No appearance For Respondents in all WP's For R1 : Mr.L.S.M.Hasan Fizal, Additional Government Pleader For R2 to 9 : No appearance
COMMON ORDER
These writ petitions have been filed to issue Writ of
Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned memorandum bearing Na.Ka.No.6488/Aa1/2008 dated 22.07.2008 issued by the first respondent and to quash the same insofar as it relates to respondents 2 to 9 herein and consequently to direct the first respondent to consider the petitioner for being promoted to the post of Assistant Divisional Fire Officer.
representation on behalf of the petitioners. Therefore, the matter was ordered to be listed on 01.09.2023 under the caption “for dismissal”.
2/4
W.P.Nos.22953 to 22959 of 2008
Even today i.e. 01.09.2023, no one appeared on behalf of the petitioners.
prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
01.09.2023
Internet: Yes Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order lok
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J.
W.P.Nos.22953 to 22959 of 2008
lok
To
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
W.P.Nos.22953 to 22959 of 2008
01.09.2023
1 issue framed by the court
Whether Writ Petitions challenging a promotion memorandum should be dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioners.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K.Rajesh Kannan
1.The Director of Fire Services
2.R.M.Abdul Bari
3.T.Venkatramanan
4.N.Loghidhass
5.S.Saravanan
G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
