The High Court dismissed W.P.No.22642 of 2015 for non-prosecution as neither the petitioner nor the respondents appeared before the Court on the date of hearing.
The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.22642 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 04.08.2023
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
W.P.No.22642 of 2015
S.Ramamoorthi
.. Petitioner
v.
_____________ Page 1 of 4_
W.P.No.22642 of 2015
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 5th respondent pertaining to the impugned order in O.A.No.128 of 2012 dated 08.04.2015 and quash the same and direct the respondent to re-fix the pay in accordance with OM No.16/6/2001-Estt.Pay dated 14.02.2006 and 04.01.2007.
For Petitioner :: No appearance For Respondents :: No appearance for R1 to R4 R5-Tribunal
ORDER
(Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J.)
When the matter was called on 28.07.2023, there was no
representation for the petitioner. So the matter was directed to be listed under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the writ petition stands dismissed for non prosecution.
(D.K.K.,J.) (P.B.B,J.) Index : yes/no 04.08.2023 Neutral citation : yes/no ss
_____________ Page 2 of 4_
W.P.No.22642 of 2015
To
_____________ Page 3 of 4_
W.P.No.22642 of 2015
D.KRISHNAKUMAR,J. AND P.B.BALAJI,J.
ss
W.P.No.22642 of 2015
04.08.2023
_____________ Page 4 of 4_
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in the absence of the petitioner.
Whether the order below should be quashed regarding pay fixation.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
S.Ramamoorthi
Union of India
D.KRIUKKUMAR
P.B.BALAJI
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
