the Administrator of the Society and impugned order dated 18.01.2019 issued by the respondent herein, relate to the work allocated to the RevisionPetition. On perusal of the two work allocation orders, it is evident that, the work allocated to the Revision-Petition vide the impugned work allocation order dated 18.01.2019 is lesser than the work allocated to the RevisionPetitioner vide the order dated 29.08.2015 of the then Administrator of the society. It is also evident that, the work allocated to the Revision-Petitioner by the respondent herein cannot be considered as degradation as alleged by the Revision-Petitioner, Bye-law NO.27(2) of the bye-laws of the society specifies the duties and responsibilities of the Secretary of the society. As per the Bye-law No.27(2)(xii) of the bye-laws of the society, “the Secretary shall do all other works as directed by the President and the Managing Committee of the Society”. The respondent herein is empowered and has the legal authority to allocate the society's official work to the employees of the society. If an employee disobeys his orders, he may initiate disciplinary proceedings in accordance the rules and regulations in force.”
