Allowed

Pavithra Sugichandran v. The Assistant commissioner of Income Tax

Madras HC23 Feb 2023WP/21622/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In three writ petitions, the High Court of Madras quashed three assessment orders dated 30.03.2022. The court held that since the search was conducted without valid authorization under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, the subsequent assessment under Section 153A was invalid. Liberty was granted for fresh proceedings following due procedure.

What did the court decide?

The impugned assessment orders dated 30.03.2022 were quashed. Liberty was granted to the respondent to proceed against the petitioner afresh following due legal procedure.

Pavithra Sugichandran Vs The Assistant commissioner… — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED : 23.02.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE

¶6

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022 and W.M.P.Nos.20642, 20651 and 20655 of 2022

¶7

Pavithra Sugichandran ... Petitioner In all W.Ps.

¶8

Vs.

¶9

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1 (4), Room No.323, 3rd Floor, Investigation Building, Chennai - 600 034.

¶10

... Respondent In all W.Ps.

¶11

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the assessment order in PAN:CNPPS5755N having DIN No.ITBA/AST/M/153A/2021-22/1042317177(1), DIN No.ITBA/AST/M/153A/2021-22/1042318654 (1) and DIN

¶12

No.ITBA/AST/M/153A/2021-22/1042319494 (1) all dated 30.03.2022 for Assessment Years 2018-19, 2019-20 and 2020-21 issued by the respondent, and quash the same as illegal.

¶13

1/5

¶14

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022

¶16

For Petitioner In all W.Ps. : Mr.K.Ravi For Respondent In all W.Ps. : Mr.A.P.Srinivas Senior Standing Counsel

¶17

COMMON ORDER

¶18

These Writ Petitions have been filed challenging the respective assessment orders in respect of three assessment years viz., 2018-19, 201920 and 2020-21 on the ground that by total non application of mind to Section 153A of the Income Tax Act, even without any authorization for search in respect of the petitioner, search was conducted as per the provisions of Section 132 of the Income Tax Act.

¶19

Admittedly, if a search is conducted by applying Section 153A of

¶20

the Income Tax Act, there should be a specific authorization. In the instant case, admittedly, there is no warrant authorization to conduct search as per Section 132 of the Income Tax Act on the petitioner.

¶21

2/5

¶22

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶23

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022

¶24

Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent has also received a written instruction from the Department which is dated 31.10.2022, admitting to the said fact. However, based on the said unauthorized search, the assessment orders have been passed, which have been challenged in this Writ Petition.

¶25

Since search under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act has not been conducted on the petitioner in accordance with law, the impugned assessment orders have to be necessarily quashed and the Writ Petitions will have to be allowed.

¶26

Accordingly, the impugned assessment orders all dated 30.03.2022 are hereby quashed and the Writ Petitions are allowed. However, liberty is granted to the respondent to proceed against the petitioner afresh by following the due procedure established under law. No Costs. Consequently, the connected Writ Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶27

23.02.2023

¶28

Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes / No Neutral Citation Case: Yes / No ab

¶29

3/5

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022

¶32

¶33

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Office of the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 1 (4), Room No.323, 3rd Floor, Investigation Building,

¶34

Chennai - 600 034.

¶35

4/5

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022

¶38

ABDUL QUDDHOSE. J.,

¶39

¶40

W.P.Nos.21622, 21635 and 21632 of 2022

¶41

23.02.2023

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

5/5

Pavithra Sugichandran v. The Assistant commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pavithra Sugichandran v. The Assistant commissioner of Income Tax

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Subramani Vs The Assistant Commissioner (St)

Cheran Properties Ltd. Vs Coimbatore city Municipal corporation

Mr. Anil Jain Vs Deputy commissioner of Income Tax

Someswari and 2 others Vs Kanimozhi

M/s.Elgi Equipments Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner

R.Veeramani Vs The Registrar of Co- Operative