Petitioner sought mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to implement an order by the 1st respondent. The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting counsel's submission and an endorsement to that effect was made in the bundle.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P. No. 20965 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 30.10.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR
W.P. No. 20965 of 2019
Kolanchi ..Petitioner
Vs.
Prayer: Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying
for issue of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the 2nd respondent to implement
1\4
W.P. No. 20965 of 2019
the order passed by the 1st respondent in his proceedings daed 16.03.2019 in
Pa.Mu.A3/1693/2018 within the time frame to be fixed by this Court.
For Petitioner :: Mr.R. Arun Dattan For Respondents :: Mr.A. Selvendran, Special Govt. Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.P.P. Shanmugasundaram for R3
O R D E R
(Made by S. Vaidyanathan,J.)
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the issue involved in
the writ petition has become infructuous and as such, nothing survives for adjudication. An endorsement to that effect has also been made in the bundle.
learned counsel for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(S.V.N.J.) (K.R.S.J.) nv 30.10.2023
2\4
W.P. No. 20965 of 2019
To
S. VAIDYANATHAN,J.
AND
K. RAJASEKAR,J.
nv
3\4
W.P. No. 20965 of 2019
W.P. No. 20965 of 2019
30.10.2023
4\4
Kolanchi
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Virudhachalam, Cuddalore District
The Tahsildar, Thittakudi Taluk, Cuddalore District
Rukkumani
S. Vaidyanathan
K. Rajasekar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
