M.Mahendran v. The State of Tamil Nadu
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras disposed of a writ petition challenging the rejection of a tender. The Court observed that while the tender was initially rejected, it was subsequently awarded to the petitioner. Consequently, no further adjudication was deemed necessary.
What did the court decide?
Writ petition closed as tender was subsequently awarded to the petitioner; no adjudication necessary.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.2028 of 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 03.04.2023
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI
W.P.No.2028 of 2020
and
W.M.P.Nos.2367, 2372 & 2377 of 2020
M.Mahendran ... Petitioner
Vs.
- The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Fort George, Chennai – 600 009.
- The Chief Engineer in Chief ( General ) Public Works Department ( Buildings) Chepauk, Chennai 600 005.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking quashing of tender rejection is maintainable when the tender was subsequently awarded to the petitioner.
Whether the court needs to adjudicate the tender rejection when the petitioner has already succeeded.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
M. Mahendran
- respondent
The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep by its Principal Secretary to Government, Public Works Department
- respondent
The Chief Engineer in Chief
- respondent
The Chief Engineer Public Works Department
- respondent
The Superintending Engineer (Buildings)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court