S.Velkumar v. the Central Information Commissioner
Madras HCWP/19659/2023
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
W.P.No.19659 of 2023 N.SESHASAYEE, J., This…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
¶1
W.P.No.19659 of 2023
¶2
W.P.No.19659 of 2023
¶3
N.SESHASAYEE, J.,
¶4
This case is posted under the caption 'for being mentioned' at the instance
¶5
of both sides.
¶6
- The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that while the causetitle of the present case is rightly given, the contents in the body of the order reflects the facts of another case in W.P.No.19661 of 2023.
¶7
- This Court perused the papers and realises that there is a major error in passing the order. Indeed the petitioner had filed two separate petitions in W.P.No.19659 of 2023 (the present case) and W.P.No.19661 of 2023. Both relate to certain information which the petitioner requires from the Central Public Information Officer, but the details so required pertains to different departments. Some error appeared to have been occasioned when the Personal Assistant concerned had typed the order. And this Court also may have to take part of the blame as it had signed the order without meticulously going through the facts of the case.
¶8
- In view of the same, it is only appropriate that this Court recalls the 1/3
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- other
N.Seshasayee
Coram
AI extract
N.Seshasayee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · P.d.audikesavalu
- Order 2 · Krishnan Ramasamy
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court