Disposed

R.Jothi v. the Joint Commissioner -I

Madras HC12 Sept 2023WP/19459/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought writ against illegal eviction and to enforce a dispute settlement resolution. Court held resolution invalid without Commissioner sanction but allowed petitioner to participate in upcoming shop auctions while retaining possession until then, requiring nominal rent.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to pay Rs.1000/month towards use and occupation from Aug 2023 until auction; possession not to be disturbed; entitled to participate in auction.

R.Jothi Vs the Joint Commissioner -I — Madras HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED :12.09.2023

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR

¶6

W.P No.19459 of 2023 and W.P No.18719 of 2023

R. Jothi

...Petitioner

Vs.

1.The Joint Commissioner -I,

¶11

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Padi, Chennai -600 050.

¶12

2.The Asst. Commissioner,

¶13

Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Padi, Chennai -600 050.

¶14

3.The Chairman, Board of Trustees,

¶15

A/m.Egambareshwarar Temple, Mint Street, Chennai – 600 003.

¶16

4.The Executive Officer, A/m.Egambareshwarar Temple, Mint Street, Chennai – 600 003. ..Respondents

¶17

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Declaration, declaring the illegal and unlawful eviction of the shop of the petitioner, measuring 91.2 sq.ft situated abutting the

¶18

1/7

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶21

premises of A/m.Egambareshwarar Temple at No.315, Mint Street, Chennai – 600 003, by the respondents 2 to 4 on 09.06.2023 is illegal and unlawful and directing the respondents to implement the Resolution No. 154 dated 01.04.2023 by allotting the alternate site in the temple premises for the business of the petitioner, by consider the representations dated 16.06.2023 and 21.06.2023 made by the petitioners to the respondents in accordance with law within a time frame as may be fixed by this Hon'ble court.

¶22

For Petitioner : Ms.G. Sumitra

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

The petitioner seeks issuance of a writ of declaration declaring the

¶25

eviction of the petitioner from the place abutting Door No.315, Mint street, Chennai is illegal and unauthorized and also seeks further direction to respondents to implement the Resolution No.154 dated 01.04.2023 passed by the Board of Trustees along with the Executive authorities.

¶26

It is the case of the petitioner that he is a tenant of the property belonged to the 4^th respondent temple. The 4^th respondent initiated eviction proceedings against the petitioner under Section 78 of HR & CE Act in

¶27

2/7

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶30

M.P.Nos.6, 9 to 12 of 2022 on the file of 1^st respondent. During pendency of eviction proceedings, the 3^rd respondent passed a resolution in Resolution No.154 dated 01.04.2023 agreeing for allotment of alternate site to the petitioner if the petitioner surrender the possession of all the 5 shops. It was also resolved that the 4^th respondent can also withdraw eviction proceedings initiated against the petitioner.

¶31

It is the case of the petitioner that without offering any alternate site to the petitioner, the respondents 2 to 4 suddenly evicted the petitioner from the place abutting Door No.315, Mint street, Chennai where he had put up a temporary bunk shop to run his business. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition.

¶32

As far as the resolution passed by the 3^rd respondent is concerned, it is in the nature of settling a dispute under litigation and therefore a resolution passed by the 3^rd respondent without getting sanction from the Commissioner of HR & CE is not valid. Under Section 43 of HR & CE Act, the trustees of the temple are not entitled to settle the dispute under litigation without getting

¶33

3/7

¶34

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶35

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶36

sanction from the Commissioner of HR & CE Department. Therefore, the prayer sought for by the petitioner to implement the resolution cannot be accepted.

¶37

Mr.N.R.R.Arun Natarajan, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents, on written instructions submits that 4^th respondent has initiated steps for auctioning 4 shops in alternate site by addressing a letter to 1^st respondent on 08.07.2023. Whenever the auction is conducted by the 4^th respondent in respect of the shops covered by his letter dated 08.07.2023, the petitioner is entitled to participate in the auction.

¶38

In view of the statement made by the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4 that 4^th respondent is going to conduct auction in respect of 4 shops in alternate sites, the petitioner is entitled to participate in the auction. Till the auction is conducted to enable the petitioner to participate in the auction for alternate site, the possession of the petitioner where he is running a temporary bunk shop abutting Door No.315, Mint Street, Chennai shall not be disturbed.

¶39

4/7

¶40

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶41

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶42

At this juncture, the learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents submits that the petitioner may be directed to pay a nominal amount towards use and occupation of the place in which he is running temporary shop.

¶43

The learned counsel for petitioner submits that earlier petitioner was paying Rs.1000/- as rent for the shop in his occupation. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and to balance rights of both the parties, the petitioner is directed to pay a sum of Rs.1000/- per month to the 4^th respondent towards use and occupation from August 2023 to till date of auction. Once auction of above mentioned four shops are over, irrespective of outcome, the petitioner shall vacate his temporary shop. If petitioner failed to vacate or commits default in payment of amount as directed, it is open to 4^th respondent to take further action in accordance with law.

¶44

5/7

¶45

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶46

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶47

With the above observations, this writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶48

12.09.2023

¶49

Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order Neutral Citation Case : Yes/No nr To 1.The Joint Commissioner -I, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Padi, Chennai -600 050. 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Department Padi, Chennai -600 050. 3.The Chairman, Board of Trustees, A/m.Egambareshwarar Temple, Mint Street, Chennai – 600 003. 4.The Executive Officer, A/m.Egambareshwarar Temple, Mint Street, Chennai – 600 003.

¶50

6/7

¶51

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶52

W.P.No.19459 of 2023

¶53

S.SOUNTHAR, J. nr

¶54

W.P No.19459 of 2023 and W.P No.18719 of 2023

¶55

12.09.2023

¶56

7/7

¶57

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Jothi v. the Joint Commissioner -I

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Jothi v. the Joint Commissioner -I

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

R.Srinivasan Vs The Commissioner

B.v.Sridhar Battachar Vs The Assistant Commissioner / Executive officer

Venkataraman Vs The Commissioner

T.Ahilan Vs The District Collector

Jothi Raja.K Vs The Principal Secretary/Member Secretary

T.M.Krishnamoorthy Vs The Erumapalayam Panchayat