Disposed

D.Velmurugan v. the Additional Registrar

Madras HC6 Nov 2023WP/19216/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner sought a Writ of Certiorari to continue in service as Office Assistant. The High Court granted liberty to file a fresh representation on regularization, directing the respondent to consider it within three months without deciding on the merits.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to make a fresh representation for regularization; direction to respondent to consider it within three months.

D.Velmurugan Vs the Additional Registrar — Cooperative Societies | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P.No.19216 of 2023

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 06.11.2023

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH

¶6

W.P.No.19216 of 2023

D.Velmurugan

...Petitioner

The Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies/ Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Union, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010.

¶11

The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cuddalore Region, No.3, Beach Road, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶12

The Principal, F.C.2863, Dr.M.G.R. Institution of Co-operative Management, No.3, Beach Road, Cuddalore – 1. ...Respondents

¶13

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, directing the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service in the third respondent Institution as Office Assistant.

¶14

1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶15

W.P.No.19216 of 2023

¶16

For Petitioner : Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Sajeev Kumar Special Government Pleader [R1] Mr.VPR.Elamparathi Additional Government Pleader [R2]

¶17

ORDER

¶18

The prayer sought for in this Writ Petition is to direct the respondents to permit the petitioner to continue in service in the third respondent Institution as Office Assistant.

¶19

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had submitted a representation on 02.02.2023, seeking for regularization. Since the said representation was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed.

¶20

In view of the order to be passed in this Writ Petition, no prejudice would be caused to the third respondent herein and hence, notice to the said private respondent is dispensed with.

¶21

2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

W.P.No.19216 of 2023

¶23

4.This Court is of the view that such a claim requires to be

¶24

considered by the respondents and this Court may not justified in stepping into the shoes of the respondents for considering the same. Nevertheless, if the petitioner is granted liberty to make a fresh representation ventilating her grievances with a consequential direction to the respondents to consider the same within a stipulated time, the ends of justice could be secured.

¶25

5.In the light of the above observations, the petitioner is granted liberty to make a fresh representation to the first respondent seeking for regularization and on receipt of the same, the first respondent is directed to consider it on its own merits and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the said representation. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any of its views with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioner and that it is open to the concerned respondent to consider the same on its own merits.

¶26

3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

W.P.No.19216 of 2023

M.S.RAMESH,J.

6.With the above direction, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶31

No costs.

¶32

06.11.2023 Index:Yes/No Speaking order/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation:Yes/No mp To

¶33

The Additional Registrar of Co-operative Societies/ Managing Director, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Union, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010. 2. The Joint Registrar of Co-operative Societies, Cuddalore Region, No.3, Beach Road, Cuddalore, Cuddalore District.

¶34

W.P.No.19216 of 2023

¶35

4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

D.Velmurugan v. the Additional Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Velmurugan v. the Additional Registrar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.Ganesh Vs The Managing Director

R.Sankar Vs Dinesh Ponraj

C.Reka Vs Anand I.A.S

M.Jamil Ahamad Vs The Government of Tamilnadu

Mr. W.Benyamin Vs The Director

A.Rajasekar Vs The Secretary to Government