The High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by an employee of the State Bank of India seeking reinstatement under a bipartite settlement, as the petitioner was absent and did not appear before the Court on the hearing dates.
Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; connected Miscellaneous Petition closed; No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
W.P.No.18582 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 07.12.2023
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mrs.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN
W.P. No.18582 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.21928 of 2018
K.Balusamy No.69, Veerappampalayam Vellandivalasu – via Sankari Taluk Salem District 637 105 ... Petitioner
/Vs/
State Bank of India Rep. by its Regional Manager No.11, Ramakrishna Road First Floor, Balaji Towers Srirangapalayam Salem 636 007 ... Respondent
Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to forthwith permit the Petitioner to rejoin duty in terms of the clause No.33 of Eighth Bipartite Settlement dated 02.06.2005 with all monetary and attendant benefits.
W.P.No.18582 of 2018
ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondent to forthwith permit the Petitioner to rejoin duty in terms of the clause No.33 of Eighth Bipartite Settlement dated 02.06.2005 with all monetary and attendant benefits.
2.When the matter was taken up on 01.12.2023, there was no representation for the Petitioner, therefore, the matter was adjourned to 04.12.2023. Again when the matter was taken up on 05.12.2023, there was no representation for the Petitioner, therefore, the matter was again adjourned to 07.12.2023.
3.Even when the matter is taken up for hearing today (07.12.2023), no one represented on behalf of the Petitioner. Hence, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
07.12.2023
Index : Yes/No Neutral citation : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non-Speaking Order
sai
2/4
W.P.No.18582 of 2018
To
The Regional Manager State Bank of India No.11, Ramakrishna Road First Floor, Balaji Towers Srirangapalayam Salem 636 007
3/4
W.P.No.18582 of 2018
V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN, J.
sai
W.P. No.18582 of 2018 and W.M.P.No.21928 of 2018
07.12.2023
4/4
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement and benefits under the Eighth Bipartite Settlement.
Whether the writ petition should be allowed in the absence of the petitioner.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
K. Balusamy
State Bank of India
V. Bhavani Subbaroyan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
