Disposed

D.Dhanavel v. The Additional Chief Secretary

Madras HC12 Oct 2023WP/1818/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged notices under the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act regarding possessed Wakf property. The Court noted the matter was already sub-judice before the Wakf Tribunal. Consequently, no interim relief was granted, and the writ petitions were disposed of with directions to the parties to approach the Tribunal.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed without granting interim relief; parties directed to approach the Wakf Tribunal.

D.Dhanavel Vs The Additional Chief Secretary — Writ and Judicial Review | Madras HC (2023)

¶1

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶3

DATED: 12.10.2023

¶4

CORAM: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. VAIDYANATHAN

¶5

and

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR

¶7

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018 and W.M.P. Nos.2234 to 2242 of 2018

¶8

D.Dhanavel Petitioner in W.P. No.1818 of 2018 S.R. Govindasamy Petitioner in W.P. No.1819 of 2018 Ramadev @ K. Daruram Petitioner in W.P. No.1820 of 2018 v

¶9

1 The Additional Chief Secretary Commissioner of Land Administration Chepauk Chennai 600 005

¶10

2 The District Collector Vellore District

¶11

3 The District Revenue Officer Vellore District

¶12

4 The Revenue Divisional Officer Ranipete Vellore District

¶13

5 The Tahsildar Walajapet Taluk Vellore District

¶14

6 The Muthavalli

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Navalpur Jamiya Masjit Ranipet, Vellore District

¶16

Respondents in all WPs.

¶17

¶18

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶19

Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India

¶20

seeking a writ of certiorari calling for the records pertaining to the notice dated

¶21

24.04.2017 issued under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act and the notice dated 10.05.2017 under Section 6, ibid. , by the fifth respondent and the consequential order made in Na.Ka.D3/2028/2017 dated 17.07.2017 passed by the second respondent and order made in T2/22143/2017 dated 16.12.2017 issued by the first respondent and quash the same and consequently, forbearing the respondents from disturbing the petitioner's possession of the property comprised of Old S.No.159 Part and T.S. No.116 in Ward No.B, Block No.6, measuring about 1,225 sq. ft. situated at Door No.35A/2, M.B.T. Road, Navalpur, Ranipet, Vellore District.

¶22

For petitioner Mr. G. Pugazhenthi For RR 1 to 5 Mr. A. Selvendran Special Government Pleader For R6 Mr. Mohammed Farook

¶23

- - - - - -

¶24

COMMON ORDER

¶25

(made by S. VAIDYANATHAN, J.)

¶26

These writ petitions have been filed challenging the notice dated

¶27

24.04.2017 under Section 7 of the Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act and

¶28

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶29

the notice dated 10.05.2017 under Section 6, ibid ., both issued by the fifth 2/6

¶30

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶31

respondent and the consequential order dated 17.07.2017 passed by the second respondent and the order dated 16.12.2017 passed by the first respondent and for a direction restraining the respondents from disturbing the petitioner's possession of the property comprised of Old S.No.159 Part and T.S. No.116 in Ward No.B, Block No.6, measuring about 1,225 sq. ft. situated at Door No.35A/2, M.B.T. Road, Navalpur, Ranipet, Vellore District.

¶32

2 It is the case of the petitioners that the property in question belongs to the wakf and the authorities have no jurisdiction to issue a notice under Section 7, ibid ., which was the subject matter of the writ petitions in W.P.Nos.22639 to 22641 of 2017 by them and aggrieved by the said notice,

¶33

appeals and revisions were filed by them; in the said writ petitions, vide order dated 24.08.2017, it was held that depending upon the disposal of the revision petition filed by them before the Commissioner, Land Administration as well as the suits filed by the fifth respondent, the petitioners are at liberty to work out their remedy insofar as the request seeking issuance of patta, in accordance with law.

¶34

3 Be it noted, the revisions preferred by the petitioners have been

¶35

dismissed vide proceedings dated 16.12.2017 of the first respondent holding https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis that the Wakf may take necessary action under the relevant Act/Rules for 3/6

¶36

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶37

removal of encroachments. During the pendency of the instant writ petitions, the petitioners have approached the Wakf Tribunal by filing suits which are now pending as O.S. Nos.332 to 334 of 2019, wherein, the petitioners have sought the relief of declaration that the notice issued by the sixth respondent therein claiming muthavalli is bad, besides seeking consequential relief.

¶38

4 Now that the matter is subjudice before the Wakf Tribunal, we are not inclined to grant any relief to the petitioners and it is for the parties to work out their remedy before the Wakf Tribunal, which is expected to take up the matter and give a quietus to the issue at the earliest, given the fact that the suits have been pending for more than four years. Needless to state, it is open to the parties to urge all their legal and factual submissions before the Wakf Tribunal, which shall be considered in accordance with law.

¶39

With the above directions, these writ petitions stand disposed of. Costs made easy. Connected W.M.Ps. are closed.

¶40

(S.V.N., J.) (K.R.S., J.) 12.10.2023

¶41

cad

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶43

4/6

¶44

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶45

¶46

1 The Additional Chief Secretary Commissioner of Land Administration Chepauk Chennai 600 005

¶47

2 The District Collector Vellore District

¶48

3 The District Revenue Officer Vellore District

¶49

4 The Revenue Divisional Officer Ranipete Vellore District

¶50

5 The Tahsildar Walajapet Taluk Vellore District

¶51

6 The Muthavalli Navalpur Jamiya Masjit Ranipet, Vellore District

¶52

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶53

5/6

¶54

W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶55

S. VAIDYANATHAN, J. and K. RAJASEKAR., J. cad

¶56

Common order in W.P. Nos.1818 to 1820 of 2018

¶57

12.10.2023

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

6/6

D.Dhanavel v. The Additional Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

D.Dhanavel v. The Additional Chief Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Perumal Vs The Deputy Inspector General Registration

The Management Vs the Principal Labour Court

R.Hariraj Vs The Registrar General

T.M.Vaithiyanathan Vs The District Collector

The Management of Deccan Designs (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs the Presiding Officer

T.Velusamy Vs the District Collector