Anitha Raj v. the President
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought mandamus for demolition of unauthorized construction. The petitioner withdrew the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with no order as to cost.
What did the court decide?
None, petition dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
W.P.No.18075 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 11.09.2023
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA
W.P.No.18075 of 2023
and WMP.No.17259 of 2023
Mrs.Anitha Raju … Petitioner
Vs.
1.The President, Thirisoolam First Grade Panchayat, 3/169, Thirisoolam, Pallavaram Post, Chennai – 600 043.
2.The Commissioner, St.Thomas Mount Panchayat Union, N.Parade Road, St.Thomas Mount, Chennai – 600 016.
3.The Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning, 2nd , 3rd and 4th Floors, CMDA Campus, C & E Market Road, Koyambedu, Chennai – 600 107.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Mrs.Anitha Raju
- respondent
The President, Thirisoolam First Grade Panchayat
- respondent
The Commissioner, St.Thomas Mount Panchayat Union
- respondent
The Director, Directorate of Town and Country Planning
- respondent
The Director, Directorate of Rural Development and Panchayat Raj
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court